Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

834 message parser meta data #853

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 10, 2023
Merged

Conversation

nickbristow
Copy link
Collaborator

PULL REQUEST

Adds an option for metadata to parse_message that returns additional metadata for each field

Summary

What changes are being proposed?

Related Issue

Fixes #834

Additional Information

Anything else the review team should know?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #853 (38c18ef) into main (b96963b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #853   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.38%   96.38%           
=======================================
  Files          45       45           
  Lines        2628     2628           
=======================================
  Hits         2533     2533           
  Misses         95       95           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 96.38% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Copy link
Collaborator

@emmastephenson emmastephenson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From a technical perspective, LGTM. But I'm still a little confused about the underlying need for this work, and I'm not sure the metadata we need to add is the FHIR metadata for a bundle - my interpretation is that it's more like the "constant" fields between conditions? But would like to check with Sarah and Ann on how we intend to use this.

Copy link
Collaborator

@emmastephenson emmastephenson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for adding the extra tests too.

@nickbristow nickbristow merged commit 4b6b66a into main Oct 10, 2023
30 checks passed
@nickbristow nickbristow deleted the 834-message-parser-meta-data branch October 10, 2023 22:16
@nickclyde nickclyde mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Spec out ideal payload from message parsing service for HTML BB
2 participants