Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop PRJC schedulers #182

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 11, 2023
Merged

Drop PRJC schedulers #182

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 11, 2023

Conversation

ventureoo
Copy link
Member

We've been discussing this for a very long time on Discord, but I think now is the time to do it. There were quite a few changes to the scheduler in 6.6, like the introduction of EEVDF. We've also gotten a lot of bugs from using PDS/BMQ for a long time, and our kernel focus has always been on developing and promoting BORE.

A few technical reasons for those people who don't understand why:

For those people who still want to use PDS, they can build it either through linux-cachyos-lts, where I still left the option to select PDS. Or revert this commit and build the latest version for 6.5.

@ptr1337
Copy link
Member

ptr1337 commented Nov 1, 2023

Personally im for this, we have here and there still some prjc users, but these are rare.
I would wait, how alfred will handle the 6.7 release in the next 2-3 weeks otherwise this can be merged.

@ventureoo
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased over the latest PKGBUILD changes.

@ventureoo ventureoo marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2023 10:04
@ventureoo ventureoo changed the title Draft: Drop PRJC Drop PRJC Dec 11, 2023
@ventureoo ventureoo changed the title Drop PRJC Drop PRJC schedulers Dec 11, 2023
Copy link
Member

@sirlucjan sirlucjan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ptr1337 ptr1337 merged commit 6be94d6 into CachyOS:master Dec 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants