We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Thank you for providing this new approach for BOF development. It really eases the dev speed and debugging capabilities.
Recently, I wanted to use getaddrinfo, described here. However, it is not possible to resolve the function address dynamically for this function.
getaddrinfo
Tried like
DFR(WS2_32, getaddrinfo); #define getaddrinfo WS2_32$getaddrinfo
and
DFR_LOCAL(WS2_32, getaddrinfo);
both fails with an error, that VS does not find the function definition.
It is also the case for freeaddrinfo.
freeaddrinfo
How could such functions be resolved with the new DFR macros. This should be the case for all functions inheriting multiple prototype definitions?
DFR
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Thank you for providing this new approach for BOF development. It really eases the dev speed and debugging capabilities.
Recently, I wanted to use
getaddrinfo
, described here. However, it is not possible to resolve the function address dynamically for this function.Tried like
and
both fails with an error, that VS does not find the function definition.
It is also the case for
freeaddrinfo
.How could such functions be resolved with the new
DFR
macros. This should be the case for all functions inheriting multiple prototype definitions?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: