RFC 2 - Readability update #2
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ce to the national level and Local Meetup Community in reference to local leve. Add 3 general community principles. Add edits to grammar
…can be directly viewed on Github with markdown applied
…TML export to include Git information. adds a py reqs file
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This RFC combines the readme files into a single README.md, which becomes viewable on Github, and which allowed me to read through the document quickly and pleasantly. This should increase accessibility generally, as viewers can see the doc on the main page.
For practical purposes, it is forked from the national-code-and-coffee branch.
You can see the result on my fork here:
https:/julianfl0w/National-Articles-of-Understanding/tree/national-code-and-coffee
The document is well written, and seems appropriate for National scope. The inclusion of W3C principles makes it strong, and the lack of formality makes it flexible.
I am still advocating for a Constitution and Bylaws for the Baltimore branch, a conversation I hope we can continue on email or Discord.
Best Regards,
Julian Loiacono
Secretary, Baltimore Code and Coffee
Edit:
An HTML exporter has been added, the results of which I have submoduled to our website and made visible here
https://baltimorecodeandcoffee.com/National-Articles-of-Understanding/