Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Easy-to-manage 360-degree rotation #811

Open
misaki-eymard opened this issue Jul 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Easy-to-manage 360-degree rotation #811

misaki-eymard opened this issue Jul 3, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@misaki-eymard
Copy link

misaki-eymard commented Jul 3, 2024

Currently, if you want to offset the looping 360-degree rotation animation, you should reset the rotation value in a short time so that the first and last key has the same key value, as shown in the following animation:
1719904600-451130-screen-recording-2024-07-02-at-161508

It would be easier to have an option for forced rotations (e.g. "1 x clockwise", "2 x counterclockwise") to create perfect cycles without having to add subframe keyframes. Perhaps properties similar to sequence attachments would be ideal if this option were added:
rotation-ui

Related forum thread:
https://esotericsoftware.com/forum/d/26453-360-rotation-cycle-not-able-to-use-offset-

@NathanSweet
Copy link
Member

The -0.1 stepped key is logical and not so bad, except that it can cause problems when scaling the whole animation. If not holding shift, the key will be lost. If holding shift it will be OK, but then other keys may land on fractional frames.

This is a general problem with scaling animations where you want some keys on fractional frames and some not. It could make sense to improve scaling, for example to preserve keys off by 0.1 when shift is not hold and they would overwrite a key with different values.

The proposed keyed rotation property is interesting, but makes for a second way to key rotation. We would need to resolve that somehow.

@FabianoIlCapo
Copy link

True, improving the scaling sounds useful to not bump in the auto snapping-while-scaling problem. It would make sense that fractional keyframes would keep their fractionality while the animation being scaled. They could keep the previous and next snapping keyframes as reference to know where to place themselves.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants