Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature: Index-based channel access from fair::mq::Device #427

Open
dennisklein opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Feature: Index-based channel access from fair::mq::Device #427

dennisklein opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@rbx
Labels
feature New feature or request
Milestone
next

Comments

@dennisklein
Copy link
Member

discussed privately with @ktf and @rbx.

  • It is currently implemented on top in O2
  • Providing such an API directly in fair::mq::Device could save some indirections
  • Should the index-based access even replace string based channel facades eventually?
@dennisklein dennisklein added the feature New feature or request label Apr 11, 2022
@rbx rbx self-assigned this Apr 11, 2022
@dennisklein dennisklein added this to the v1.5 milestone May 27, 2022
@dennisklein dennisklein modified the milestones: v1.5, v1.6 Aug 12, 2022
dennisklein added a commit to dennisklein/FairMQ that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2023
@dennisklein
feat: Deprecate Device::fChannels in preparation for FairRootGroup#427
b06620c
dennisklein added a commit to dennisklein/FairMQ that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2023
@dennisklein
feat: Deprecate Device::fChannels in preparation for FairRootGroup#427
919c496
dennisklein added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2023
@dennisklein
feat: Deprecate Device::fChannels in preparation for #427
5ef17fd
@dennisklein dennisklein modified the milestones: v1.6, next Jun 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rbx rbx

Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
next
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dennisklein @rbx