You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Current version is assuming on getting BlockSampledDataLake only Ethereum Sepolia network. However, in the future, as we planning on supporting other networks, we need to specify exact chain Id in BlockSampledDataLake field.
more, before hardfork of ethereum, there was no chain_id was introduced, so without passing chain_id would result unsound TransactionsInBlockDatalake
Here is following todos:
BlockSampledDatalake
(hdp-cli) add chain_id as field of BlockSampledDataLake struct.
context
Current version is assuming on getting
BlockSampledDataLake
onlyEthereum Sepolia
network. However, in the future, as we planning on supporting other networks, we need to specify exact chain Id inBlockSampledDataLake
field.more, before hardfork of ethereum, there was no chain_id was introduced, so without passing chain_id would result unsound
TransactionsInBlockDatalake
Here is following todos:
BlockSampledDatalake
chain_id
as field ofBlockSampledDataLake
struct.chain_id
as field ofBlockSampledDataLake
struct.chain_id
as field ofBlockSampledDataLake
struct.chain_id
as field ofBlockSampledDataLake
struct.TransactionsInBlockDatalake
chain_id
as field ofTransactionsInBlockDatalake
struct.chain_id
as field ofTransactionsInBlockDatalake
struct.chain_id
as field ofTransactionsInBlockDatalake
struct.chain_id
as field ofTransactionsInBlockDatalake
struct.Test check
Make sure to have hash be same around all flow
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: