Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ledger Quantitative Timeliness Agreements, QTAs #4637

Open
nfrisby opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Ledger Quantitative Timeliness Agreements, QTAs #4637

nfrisby opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@nfrisby
Copy link
Contributor

nfrisby commented Sep 17, 2024

@njd42 suggested these a while ago, and there was some planning around them, but for various reasons (I think personnel churn), the work disappeared.

The basic idea (feel free to edit this, Neil) is that the different components/teams need to specify their expected performance profiles, and add some benchmarks/tests to catch performance regressions/violations.

For now, I'm just opening this same Issue mutatis mutandi in the Plutus, Ledger, Consensus, and Network repositories. Each team will at least need to consider what they want to do and want others to do.

@semanticphilosopher
Copy link

The notion of a QTA is that you recognise the "demand" and the "supply" - the supply here is the timeliness, the demand here is the computation (and other) resources required to complete the task.

If you don't acknowledge and capture the consumption of resources then you have the real risk of not meeting the timeliness when things are integrated, and you then end up in the tali chasing action of trying to improve performance right near deadlines.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants