Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consensus Quantitative Timeliness Agreements, aka QTAs #1256

Open
nfrisby opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Consensus Quantitative Timeliness Agreements, aka QTAs #1256

nfrisby opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
🌐 external needs-grooming ❓ The issue needs more details before people can start working on it 🏎️ performance profiling technical debt Technical debt

Comments

@nfrisby
Copy link
Contributor

nfrisby commented Sep 17, 2024

@njd42 suggested these a while ago, and there was some planning around them, but for various reasons (I think personnel churn), the work disappeared.

The basic idea (feel free to edit this, Neil) is that the different components/teams need to specify their expected performance profiles, and add some benchmarks/tests to catch performance regressions/violations.

For now, I'm just opening this same Issue mutatis mutandi in the Plutus, Ledger, Consensus, and Network repositories. Each team will at least need to consider what they want to do and want others to do.

@nfrisby nfrisby added 🌐 external technical debt Technical debt profiling needs-grooming ❓ The issue needs more details before people can start working on it 🏎️ performance labels Sep 17, 2024
@dnadales
Copy link
Member

This seems related to #72

@nfrisby nfrisby self-assigned this Sep 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🌐 external needs-grooming ❓ The issue needs more details before people can start working on it 🏎️ performance profiling technical debt Technical debt
Projects
Status: 🏗 In progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants