Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove GCC warnings ignored #107

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2023
Merged

Conversation

tdejoigny-ledger
Copy link
Contributor

remove GCC warnings ignored

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 28, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (8464a2c) 80.43% compared to head (3cc256b) 80.43%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #107   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.43%   80.43%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines          46       46           
=======================================
  Hits           37       37           
  Misses          9        9           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 80.43% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tdejoigny-ledger tdejoigny-ledger force-pushed the tdj/remove_warn_disable branch 2 times, most recently from f77301f to f35921a Compare November 28, 2023 14:39
@tdejoigny-ledger tdejoigny-ledger force-pushed the tdj/remove_warn_disable branch 2 times, most recently from 3346d89 to 132b366 Compare November 28, 2023 17:54
@tdejoigny-ledger tdejoigny-ledger merged commit 6b08fc8 into master Nov 29, 2023
41 checks passed
@tdejoigny-ledger tdejoigny-ledger deleted the tdj/remove_warn_disable branch November 29, 2023 08:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants