Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

workflows/python_client_checks.yml: Remove useless pip install extra url #112

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

xchapron-ledger
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

lpascal-ledger
lpascal-ledger previously approved these changes Feb 9, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (7d1c3c3) 83.01% compared to head (5eb4c07) 83.01%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #112   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.01%   83.01%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines          53       53           
=======================================
  Hits           44       44           
  Misses          9        9           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 83.01% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@xchapron-ledger xchapron-ledger changed the title workflows/python_client_checks.yml: Remove useless pip install workflows/python_client_checks.yml: Remove useless pip install extra url Feb 9, 2024
@xchapron-ledger xchapron-ledger merged commit 5c70002 into master Feb 9, 2024
37 checks passed
@xchapron-ledger xchapron-ledger deleted the xch/CI-python-check branch February 9, 2024 09:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants