-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add map: Giant Chess #312
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add map: Giant Chess #312
Conversation
Pieces look nice, but overall the map looks boring. Maybe add tunnels if there already aren't. Also, you could replace "chess" with "Chessboard" in the title (my opinion :) |
lol, another player and I were working on a similar map. |
Also, does this map have two teams or 4 teams? |
It's two teams. I'm still trying to think of what else could be added. |
In that case me and my friend will work on a four team chess map |
If this map gets merged, your map will have to have more differences than simply be four teams instead of two teams. Originality/uniqueness is important. Just letting you know so it doesn't end up being a waste of time. |
I wouldn't want to interfere with a better map (if it is better). I didn't know anyone else was doing something similar. What is yours like? |
We are still in a designing phase, but I do know that we are using a whole different color pallet. Though we where also going to make the chess board and pieces large. |
@lazylier An update to the actual CTF version would be nice. Also the licence is missing and you can delete the part behind This is no full review: As mentioned, tunnels might not be a bad idea, but at least the blocks are breakable. It just takes a while to dig through the different block types. Speaking of nade fight mode: you can easily nade the base from the neighbouring pieces. Perhaps it would also be better to use two indestructible layers of blocks for the base area. To prevent nade spam from below. For my part, I will test the map in more detail at the next opportunity, but would be interested in feedback from other testers regarding the gameplay and whether the map can be fun. |
@lazylier let me know when the issues are fixed. I think you should also add a 4.0 after your preferred license. |
ok, I still want to add some more tunnels too |
Should be good now. |
@lazylier I like the map, even if some people will dislike the differences in altitude. I prefer this to a simple flat chessboard, but I would like to see a few blocks as initial items. Ladders would be good. If you add the ladders (or other blocks), I will approve the map. |
I've tried to make this good. There are some hidden ladders, and most pieces have mese or diamonds somewhere inside.