Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MIG] sale_restricted_qty to 14.0 #1961

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Apr 4, 2022

Conversation

AshishHirapara
Copy link
Contributor

Migrated sale_restricted_qty to 14.0 from 12.0

@AshishHirapara AshishHirapara force-pushed the 14.0-mig-sale_restricted_qty branch 2 times, most recently from f01155b to 10c3fcf Compare March 25, 2022 10:25
@AshishHirapara AshishHirapara mentioned this pull request Mar 25, 2022
87 tasks
@AshishHirapara AshishHirapara force-pushed the 14.0-mig-sale_restricted_qty branch 2 times, most recently from 6b594b7 to 309eea5 Compare March 26, 2022 07:24
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

@rousseldenis rousseldenis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

/ocabot migration sale_restricted_qty

@elvise
Copy link

elvise commented Mar 29, 2022

@AshishHirapara @rousseldenis functional test ok!

Copy link
Contributor

@francesco-ooops francesco-ooops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (functional review)

@rousseldenis is it ok now?

@AshishHirapara
Copy link
Contributor Author

Add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS

@rousseldenis done

@elvise
Copy link

elvise commented Apr 1, 2022

@rousseldenis what do you think can we merge ?

Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

@rousseldenis rousseldenis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AshishHirapara For the next time, could you follow migration guide ?

https:/OCA/maintainer-tools/wiki/Migration-to-version-14.0#technical-method-to-migrate-a-module-from-130-to-140-branch

Especially the full process part in order to have a commit for sytnax fixing and then the migration commit. Thanks

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it!
Prepared branch 14.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1961-by-rousseldenis-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit f54af2c into OCA:14.0 Apr 4, 2022
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at b40d75e. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@AshishHirapara
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AshishHirapara For the next time, could you follow migration guide ?

OCA/maintainer-tools/wiki/Migration-to-version-14.0#technical-method-to-migrate-a-module-from-130-to-140-branch

Especially the full process part in order to have a commit for sytnax fixing and then the migration commit. Thanks

@rousseldenis could you guide me on what went wrong with this commit Or which part of that guide did I miss? Because I have followed all the steps mentioned in that guide, and squashed previous commits of mine. So I will be more careful next time.
Thanks

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

image

You should have two commits, one with "[IMP] sale_restricted_qty: black, isort, prettier" that should not be squashed and then the migration one. That in order to split the changes that are really migration

@alexey-pelykh
Copy link

@rousseldenis did you see that there's duplication in views for product variants?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants