Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option to make Content-ID header optional #2713

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: release-7.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

quanterion
Copy link
Contributor

Issues

*This pull request adds ability to read OData 2.0 batch requests that do not require Content-ID header

Description

Add options to disable throwing exceptions if no Content-ID header is present in chgangeset

Checklist (Uncheck if it is not completed)

  • Test cases added
  • Build and test with one-click build and test script passed

Additional work necessary

If documentation update is needed, please add "Docs Needed" label to the issue and provide details about the required document change in the issue.

}
else
{
this.currentContentId = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it better to change the type of 'CurrentContentId' to System.Guid?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

currentContentId is an arbitrary value of user-provided header. I assign it to guid just for specific case

@@ -235,6 +236,12 @@ public ODataMessageQuotas MessageQuotas
/// </summary>
internal bool ThrowOnUndeclaredPropertyForNonOpenType { get; private set; }

/// <summary>
/// Require Content-Id header in changesets
/// If turned off allows to read OData 2.0 requests without Content-Id header present.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do you mean about "OData 2.0" ? It's a OData spec version number?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@xuzhg @mikepizzo Do we really still support pre 4.0 versions on ODL 7.x?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be precise this small addition not to support 4.0 metadata, just for reading requests

[Fact]
public void ReadMultipartMixedBatchRequestWthoutContentId()
{
var payload = Regex.Replace(batchRequestPayload, "Content-ID: .", "");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we can't use the String.Replace to replace it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@quanterion quanterion Aug 2, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because I want to remove all Content-ID headers, not just one (in regex symbol . means any symbol)

xuzhg
xuzhg previously approved these changes Aug 14, 2023
@quanterion
Copy link
Contributor Author

@habbes Address comments, please have a look

@quanterion
Copy link
Contributor Author

@habbes Gentle ping

@habbes
Copy link
Contributor

habbes commented Jan 24, 2024

@quanterion looks good to me. Kindly rebase your branch with master.

Copy link
Contributor

@habbes habbes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, since the default for the new ThrowIfMissingContentIdChangeset option preserves the existing behaviour of throwing an exception. Kindly resolve the conflicts with the master branch.

@habbes
Copy link
Contributor

habbes commented Jan 24, 2024

I've fixed the conflicts with the master branch.

This PR has 109 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Medium
Size       : +97 -12
Percentile : 41.8%

Total files changed: 9

Change summary by file extension:
.cs : +86 -5
.txt : +11 -7

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants