Feat(pkgs/dmd): 2.108.1 and 2.109.1

[dukc]

As per title. I tested only 2.108 locally though, lets see what the autotester will say about 2.109.

[dukc]

The old way of manually specifying this led to an annoying troubleshooting detour for me when I didn't realise to increment it ("Why is that Ddoc year test we disabled ages ago failing?"), so I thought it better to do it this way.

[github-actions]

Thanks for your Pull Request!

Below you will find a summary of the cachix status of each package, for each supported platform.

package	x86_64-linux	x86_64-darwin	aarch64-darwin
dmd	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-2_092_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-2_096_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-2_098_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-2_100_2	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-2_102_2	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-2_103_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-2_104_2	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-2_105_2	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-2_105_3	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-2_106_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-2_107_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-2_108_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-2_109_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-binary-2_079_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-binary-2_080_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-binary-2_081_2	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-binary-2_082_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-binary-2_083_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-binary-2_084_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-binary-2_085_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-binary-2_086_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-binary-2_087_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-binary-2_088_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-binary-2_089_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-binary-2_090_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-binary-2_098_0	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dmd-bootstrap	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
dub	✅ cached	✅ cached	✅ cached
dub-1_30_0	✅ cached	✅ cached	✅ cached
ldc	✅ cached	🚧 known to fail (disabled)	🚧 known to fail (disabled)
ldc-1_30_0	✅ cached	🚧 known to fail (disabled)	🚧 known to fail (disabled)
ldc-binary-1_19_0	✅ cached	✅ cached	🚫 not supported
ldc-binary-1_25_0	✅ cached	✅ cached	✅ cached
ldc-binary-1_28_0	✅ cached	✅ cached	✅ cached
ldc-binary-1_32_1	✅ cached	✅ cached	✅ cached
ldc-binary-1_34_0	✅ cached	✅ cached	✅ cached
ldc-bootstrap	✅ cached	✅ cached	✅ cached

[dukc]

@PetarKirov it seems the tests do pass. (Originally one failed, the failure seemed spurious and I just restarted it at some point and was too lazy to check back earlier). Can this go in?

[dukc]

No comment so I assume it's good to go.