Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(apps/prod/jenkins-beta): add a jenkins-beta for debug test #653

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Aug 1, 2023

Conversation

purelind
Copy link
Contributor

Add a jenkins-beta for debug test.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested review from jayl1e and wuhuizuo July 26, 2023 10:06
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XXL label Jul 26, 2023
@purelind
Copy link
Contributor Author

purelind commented Jul 26, 2023

/hold

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 26, 2023

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Pull Request Summary

Title: feat(apps/prod/jenkins-beta): add a jenkins-beta for debug test

Description: Add a jenkins-beta for debug test.

This pull request introduces a new Jenkins Beta for debugging tests. The key changes are as follows:

  1. Added a new jenkins-beta Kustomization with resources pre.yaml, release.yaml, and post.yaml.
  2. Created new files for Jenkins Beta configuration, including RBAC settings, pre and post Kustomizations, and various values files for different Jenkins settings.
  3. Added new namespace configuration for Jenkins Beta and modified Ingress settings.

Potential Problems

  1. The created Jenkins Beta instance might consume a lot of resources (CPU and memory) as it is configured with high resource limits.
  2. The new Jenkins Beta might conflict with any existing Jenkins instances in the cluster.

Fixing Suggestions

  1. Review the resource limits and requests for the Jenkins Beta instance and adjust them as necessary to reduce the resource consumption.
  2. Ensure that there are no conflicts with other Jenkins instances in the cluster by checking the namespace, service accounts, and ingress configurations.

Overall, the pull request seems well structured, and the changes are logically organized. However, it is essential to double-check the resource limits and potential conflicts to avoid any issues during deployment.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 26, 2023

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Pull Request Summary

This pull request adds a new jenkins-beta instance for debug testing purposes. The key changes are:

  1. New Kubernetes resources are added, including a Kustomization, Kustomization resources, and HelmRelease.
  2. New configuration files for Jenkins-Beta are added, including RBAC, ObjectBucketClaim, and Secrets.
  3. Namespace, Jenkins-Beta environment variables, and Jenkins-Beta plugins configurations are updated.
  4. Persistence settings and Service Account settings for Jenkins-Beta are also updated.

Potential Problems

  1. The current configuration uses ReadWriteOnce as the accessMode for the PVC in values-persistence.yaml. If the number of replicas is greater than 1, this access mode may not support Jenkins server HA mode. It might be necessary to change the access mode to ReadWriteMany.

Suggestions

  1. To support Jenkins server HA mode when the number of replicas is greater than 1, change the access mode for the PVC in values-persistence.yaml to ReadWriteMany.
persistence:
  accessMode: "ReadWriteMany"
  1. Ensure proper testing of the new Jenkins-Beta instance to validate its functionality and identify any other potential issues.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 26, 2023

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Pull Request Review

Title: feat(apps/prod/jenkins-beta): add a jenkins-beta for debug test

Description: Add a jenkins-beta for debug test.

Summary of Key Changes:

  1. Added new files related to jenkins-beta in the apps/prod directory.
  2. Created a Kustomization file for jenkins-beta with pre, release, and post configurations.
  3. Added new RBAC configurations for jenkins-beta.
  4. Created a new namespace and configured ObjectBucketClaim and Secret.
  5. Added new Kustomization configurations for jenkins-beta release.

Potential Problems:

  1. The jenkins-beta namespace is hard-coded in the namespace-agent.yaml file. This might cause issues if the namespace needs to be changed.

Fixing Suggestions:

  1. Use a variable for the jenkins-beta namespace in the namespace-agent.yaml file so that it can be easily changed if required.
- metadata:
-   name: jenkins-beta
+ metadata:
+   name: ${NAMESPACE}

Please make the necessary changes, test the implementation, and update the pull request accordingly.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 26, 2023

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Pull Request Review Summary

Title: feat(apps/prod/jenkins-beta): add a jenkins-beta for debug test

Description: Add a jenkins-beta for debug test.

Key changes:

  1. Adding a new Jenkins-beta for debug test in apps/prod/jenkins-beta.
  2. Creating new kustomization files, pre, post, and release configurations.
  3. Creating new Jenkins resources and RBAC configurations for the jenkins-beta.
  4. Creating new ObjectBucketClaim and related secrets.
  5. Configuring Jenkins helm chart values for the jenkins-beta environment.

Potential problems:

No major problems identified.

Fixing suggestions:

  1. Make sure that the newly added resources do not conflict with any existing resources in the cluster.
  2. Verify that the Jenkins configurations are correct and secure for the intended purpose.
  3. Test the new Jenkins-beta environment and ensure it is working as expected.

Overall, the pull request seems well-structured and does not introduce any major issues.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 26, 2023

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Pull Request Summary

This pull request adds Jenkins-Beta for debug test, including the necessary configurations and setup files. The key changes are the addition of new files such as Kustomization files, Jenkins setup files, and RBAC configuration files.

Potential Issues

  • The PR adds many new files, which could lead to potential conflicts with existing files in the repository.
  • Some of the configuration files might not have the correct settings or might be missing some required settings.
  • The added Jenkins-Beta setup might not be compatible with other components in the system.

Fixing Suggestions

  1. Make sure there are no conflicts with existing files in the repository. If there are any conflicts, resolve them accordingly.
  2. Double-check the configuration files to ensure all the necessary settings are present and correct.
  3. Test the added Jenkins-Beta setup with other components in the system to ensure compatibility.
  4. If any issues are found during testing, make the necessary adjustments to the files and configurations to resolve the issues.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 26, 2023

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Pull Request Summary

Title: feat(apps/prod/jenkins-beta): add a jenkins-beta for debug test

Description: Add a jenkins-beta for debug test.

Key Changes:

  1. Added a new Jenkins-beta setup with Kustomization configuration and related files.
  2. Created new files for Jenkins-beta, including kustomization.yaml, pre.yaml, release.yaml, post.yaml, and corresponding resources.
  3. Set up a new namespace for Jenkins-beta with a dedicated jenkins-beta service account.
  4. Configured Jenkins-beta deployment with various customizations, including environment variables, plugins, persistence, and service account settings.

Potential Problems:

  1. The pull request adds a significant amount of configuration files, which might make the repository harder to maintain and understand.
  2. Some values in the configuration files might conflict with existing settings, causing unexpected behavior or errors.

Fixing Suggestions:

  1. Ensure that the new Jenkins-beta configuration doesn't conflict with any existing setup. Double-check the values in the configuration files to make sure they are consistent with the intended setup.
  2. Consider consolidating the configuration files or using a more modular approach to make the repository easier to maintain.
  3. Perform thorough testing of the new Jenkins-beta setup to ensure it works as expected and doesn't introduce any new issues.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 26, 2023

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Pull Request Summary

Title: Add a jenkins-beta for debug test

Description: This PR introduces a new jenkins-beta for debug testing purposes.

Key Changes

  1. New files have been added for jenkins-beta, including kustomization.yaml, pre.yaml, post.yaml, and their corresponding configuration files.
  2. A new namespace jenkins-beta is created for the debug test.
  3. New Role and RoleBinding are created for jenkins-beta in post/_base/rbac.yaml.
  4. New ObjectBucketClaim is created in pre/obc.yaml.
  5. Jenkins configuration is updated with environment variables and plugins in various values-*.yaml files.

Potential Problems

  • There might be conflicts between values in different values-*.yaml files, which can cause issues during deployment.
  • Some of the resources might not have proper access controls or permissions, causing potential security vulnerabilities.
  • The newly added jenkins-beta might interfere with other existing services and resources in the cluster.

Fixing Suggestions

  1. Review the values in different values-*.yaml files and ensure there are no conflicts or overriding values.
  2. Double-check the access controls and permissions for all the new resources created in this PR. Ensure that they follow the principle of least privilege.
  3. Test the newly added jenkins-beta in a separate namespace or test environment to avoid any interference with existing services and resources.

Here's the markdown version of the changes:

### Pull Request Summary

**Title:** Add a `jenkins-beta` for debug test

**Description:** This PR introduces a new `jenkins-beta` for debug testing purposes.

#### Key Changes

1. New files have been added for `jenkins-beta`, including `kustomization.yaml`, `pre.yaml`, `post.yaml`, and their corresponding configuration files.
2. A new namespace `jenkins-beta` is created for the debug test.
3. New `Role` and `RoleBinding` are created for `jenkins-beta` in `post/_base/rbac.yaml`.
4. New `ObjectBucketClaim` is created in `pre/obc.yaml`.
5. Jenkins configuration is updated with environment variables and plugins in various `values-*.yaml` files.

#### Potential Problems

- There might be conflicts between values in different `values-*.yaml` files, which can cause issues during deployment.
- Some of the resources might not have proper access controls or permissions, causing potential security vulnerabilities.
- The newly added `jenkins-beta` might interfere with other existing services and resources in the cluster.

#### Fixing Suggestions

1. Review the values in different `values-*.yaml` files and ensure there are no conflicts or overriding values.
2. Double-check the access controls and permissions for all the new resources created in this PR. Ensure that they follow the principle of least privilege.
3. Test the newly added `jenkins-beta` in a separate namespace or test environment to avoid any interference with existing services and resources.

@purelind
Copy link
Contributor Author

3. Test the newly added `jenkins-beta` in a separate namespace or test environment to avoid any interference with existing services and resources.
  1. Test the newly added jenkins-beta in a separate namespace or test environment to avoid any interference with existing services and resources.

Is suggestion 3 reasonable? Can it be deployed to another namespace?

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 26, 2023

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Pull Request Review

Title: feat(apps/prod/jenkins-beta): add a jenkins-beta for debug test

Description: Add a jenkins-beta for debug test.

Key Changes

  • New Jenkins-beta configuration files have been added.
  • Kustomization files have been added for pre, post, and release stages.
  • Jenkins-beta RBAC configuration is added.
  • ObjectBucketClaim (OBC) for Jenkins-beta is added.
  • Namespace configuration for Jenkins-beta is added.
  • HelmRelease configuration for Jenkins-beta is added.
  • Various Jenkins-beta configurations and settings are added.

Potential Problems

  • No clear indication of any testing performed on these changes.
  • The PR description is quite minimal and does not provide much context.

Fixing Suggestions

  • Perform testing to ensure that the new Jenkins-beta configuration works as expected.
  • Update the PR description with more context and details about the changes, and their purpose.
  • In apps/prod/jenkins-beta/post/_base/rbac.yaml, make sure the Role and RoleBinding are scoped to the correct namespace, and update the namespace if needed.
  • In apps/prod/jenkins-beta/release/values-controller.yaml, double-check the Jenkins URI prefix, hostname, and other configurations to ensure they are accurate for the intended environment.
  • Review the added Jenkins plugins and configurations to ensure they meet the project requirements and follow best practices.
### Pull Request Review

**Title**: `feat(apps/prod/jenkins-beta): add a jenkins-beta for debug test`

**Description**: Add a jenkins-beta for debug test.

#### Key Changes

- New Jenkins-beta configuration files have been added.
- Kustomization files have been added for pre, post, and release stages.
- Jenkins-beta RBAC configuration is added.
- ObjectBucketClaim (OBC) for Jenkins-beta is added.
- Namespace configuration for Jenkins-beta is added.
- HelmRelease configuration for Jenkins-beta is added.
- Various Jenkins-beta configurations and settings are added.

#### Potential Problems

- No clear indication of any testing performed on these changes.
- The PR description is quite minimal and does not provide much context.

#### Fixing Suggestions

- Perform testing to ensure that the new Jenkins-beta configuration works as expected.
- Update the PR description with more context and details about the changes, and their purpose.
- In `apps/prod/jenkins-beta/post/_base/rbac.yaml`, make sure the `Role` and `RoleBinding` are scoped to the correct namespace, and update the namespace if needed.
- In `apps/prod/jenkins-beta/release/values-controller.yaml`, double-check the Jenkins URI prefix, hostname, and other configurations to ensure they are accurate for the intended environment.
- Review the added Jenkins plugins and configurations to ensure they meet the project requirements and follow best practices.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 26, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jul 26, 2023

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2023-07-26 12:20:26.702594257 +0000 UTC m=+356969.297125230: ☑️ agreed by wuhuizuo.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Jul 26, 2023
@purelind
Copy link
Contributor Author

purelind commented Aug 1, 2023

/unhold

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 9f96de6 into PingCAP-QE:main Aug 1, 2023
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants