Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix some comments #116

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions README_offline_transaction_signing.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -523,15 +523,15 @@ shortfalls:
- AMOUNT - How many coins you want to send. You can specify payments not only up
to 2 decimal places, traditionally reserved for cents, but up to 6
decimal places. You can therefore send milli (0.001) and micro (0.000001)
coin payments. In the transaction text is is written as value.fraction,
coin payments. In the transaction text is written as value.fraction,
i.e. 12.4 or 0.0024
- MEMO - The text memo is a description that you and the recipient can read
regarding the transaction. It can for instance contain an invoice
number for goods purchased.
- CONFIRMATIONS - How many network confirmations must occur before the transaction
is deemed successful. It is safe to leave this at 1
- FEE - How many coins you want to pay the pirate network backoffice in fees
for maintaining the pirate network. In the transaction text is is
for maintaining the pirate network. In the transaction text is
written as value.fraction, i.e. 0.0001

It's best to construct the transaction in an external text editor and copy and
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/cc/hempcoin_notes.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ paymentsfund:
get the payment fund scriptpubkey hex from vout 0: (the split it at OP_CHECKCRYPTOCONDITION or 'cc' )
2ea22c8020987fad30df055db6fd922c3a57e55d76601229ed3da3b31340112e773df3d0d28103120c008203000401cc 2a0401f00101246a22f046337db779358deaa69b9af053e27d85cb8e8e48b0b13805c084b04f87be6577ee75

put the second half into an OP_RETURN: (the remaining part of the the above scriptpubkey) eg.
put the second half into an OP_RETURN: (the remaining part of the above scriptpubkey) eg.
./komodo-cli -ac_name=TESTHC opreturn_burn 1 2a0401f00101246a22f046337db779358deaa69b9af053e27d85cb8e8e48b0b13805c084b04f87be6577ee75
opret_burn takes any burn amount and arbitrary hex string. (RPC works, but may have bugs, likely use this for LABS too with some fixes)
this gives a raw hex. Decode it and check the OP_RETURN is right before sending.
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/cc/sudoku.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@
/* And that brings me to this topic: What do all these points mean? */
/* */
/* Well, who knows? This is still subjective, and the weighting system I've chosen */
/* for point scoring is is largely arbitrary. But based upon feedback from a number */
/* for point scoring is largely arbitrary. But based upon feedback from a number */
/* of individuals, a rough scale of difficulty plays out as follows: */
/* */
/* DEGREE OF DIFFICULTY | SCORE */
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/secp256k1/src/modules/musig/example.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ int sign(const secp256k1_context* ctx, unsigned char seckeys[][32], const secp25
for (i = 0; i < N_SIGNERS; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < N_SIGNERS; j++) {
/* To check whether signing was successful, it suffices to either verify
* the the combined signature with the combined public key using
* the combined signature with the combined public key using
* secp256k1_schnorrsig_verify, or verify all partial signatures of all
* signers individually. Verifying the combined signature is cheaper but
* verifying the individual partial signatures has the advantage that it
Expand Down