Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generalize Contingency #16

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2024
Merged

Generalize Contingency #16

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

wouterwln
Copy link
Member

I don't like the implementation of vague now but at least this is consistent with the existing interface. I'd rather have vague(Contingency, (3,4,5)) though.

@wouterwln wouterwln requested a review from bvdmitri July 9, 2024 12:22
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.00%. Comparing base (c3fa178) to head (6eda8ad).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #16   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.00%   77.00%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines        1100     1100           
=======================================
  Hits          847      847           
  Misses        253      253           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@albertpod
Copy link
Member

Well-done @wouterwln! LGTM.

@albertpod albertpod self-requested a review July 9, 2024 12:30
@wouterwln wouterwln merged commit 0aa873c into main Jul 9, 2024
4 checks passed
@wouterwln wouterwln deleted the general-contingency branch October 9, 2024 08:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants