Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adjoint equivalence between (ℚ, _≤_, _≡_) and (ℚᵘ, _≤_, _≃_) via toℚᵘ / fromℚᵘ #2113

Open
jamesmckinna opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Adjoint equivalence between (ℚ, _≤_, _≡_) and (ℚᵘ, _≤_, _≃_) via toℚᵘ / fromℚᵘ #2113

jamesmckinna opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
addition

Comments

@jamesmckinna
Copy link
Contributor

jamesmckinna commented Sep 29, 2023 •
edited
Loading

This ought to be low-hanging fruit (UPDATED; but I'm not sure that it is, entirely, or at least, it's an amount of work to put it all together, so dropping that label for now), but would streamline 'transfer' arguments about instances of the order relations between the two types, eg in the proof <-dense in Data.Rational.Properties in #2111.
@jamesmckinna jamesmckinna changed the title Adjoint equivalence between (ℚ, _<_, _≡_) and (ℚᵘ, _<_, _≃_) via toℚᵘ / fromℚᵘ Adjoint equivalence between (ℚ, _≤_, _≡_) and (ℚᵘ, _≤_, _≃_) via toℚᵘ / fromℚᵘ Oct 9, 2023
@jamesmckinna jamesmckinna mentioned this issue Mar 25, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
addition
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jamesmckinna