Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document SpockM, SpockCtxM, WebStateM, WebStateT, ActionT, ActionCtxT #109

Open
Profpatsch opened this issue Feb 7, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@Profpatsch
Copy link

Profpatsch commented Feb 7, 2017

All of these types have no docstrings, and it’s not obvious what part of the stack they represent. Thus as a user one has to infer it by clicking through type aliases (practically every time, since the naming scheme is not at all obvious and hard to remember).

@agrafix
Copy link
Owner

agrafix commented Feb 7, 2017

Would you like to help with this via PR?

@Profpatsch
Copy link
Author

I can try, of course you’d have to annotate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants