Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #2206: Allow content-types "application/xxx+json" in ClientResponse.json() #2819

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 9, 2018

Conversation

livercat
Copy link
Contributor

@livercat livercat commented Mar 9, 2018

What do these changes do?

Allow content-types "application/xxx+json" in ClientResponse.json()

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

Yes, extended forms of "application/json" (see examples) will be accepted as valid json.

Related issue number

#2206

Checklist

  • I think the code is well written
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes
  • If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
    • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
    • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
  • Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES folder
    • name it <issue_id>.<type> for example (588.bugfix)
    • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
    • ensure type is one of the following:
      • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
      • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
      • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
      • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
      • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
    • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 9, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #2819 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2819      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.99%   97.99%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        7379     7385       +6     
  Branches     1296     1297       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         7231     7237       +6     
  Misses         47       47              
  Partials      101      101
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
aiohttp/client_reqrep.py 97.47% <100%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7f7b12a...f342305. Read the comment docs.

@asvetlov asvetlov merged commit 3debc53 into aio-libs:master Mar 9, 2018
@asvetlov
Copy link
Member

asvetlov commented Mar 9, 2018

Thanks!

@livercat livercat deleted the xxx+json branch March 10, 2018 09:28
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Oct 28, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a [new issue] for related bugs.
If you feel like there's important points made in this discussion, please include those exceprts into that [new issue].
[new issue]: https:/aio-libs/aiohttp/issues/new

@lock lock bot added the outdated label Oct 28, 2019
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 28, 2019
@psf-chronographer psf-chronographer bot added the bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR label Oct 28, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bot:chronographer:provided There is a change note present in this PR outdated
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants