Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Inline image rendering #505

Open
Karthik-Dulam opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Feature request: Inline image rendering #505

Karthik-Dulam opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@Karthik-Dulam
Copy link

Is it technologically viable to have inline rendered images?
Similar to org-mode's latex preview which can render latex fragments inside the document.
This would be especially useful for in-document LaTex previews.

@akiyosi
Copy link
Owner

akiyosi commented Nov 6, 2023

Hi :)
Thanks for this issue.

Is it technologically viable to have inline rendered images?
Similar to org-mode's latex preview which can render latex fragments inside the document.
This would be especially useful for in-document LaTex previews.

It is possible, because goneovim is a complete GUI application. There is one idea PR related to this. #360

One major difficulty is that no standard mechanism or interface for handling images has been established in the current Neovim architecture. This means that if implemented in Goneovim, it would be a Goneovim-specific mechanism, which would not allow for sufficient ecosystem growth.
I believe that image handling needs to be a common mechanism in the Neovim GUI, but we are still in the middle of the road regarding the study of this common mechanism.

@Karthik-Dulam
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your response. I have started a discussion on the neovim repo.
Would be helpful if you can clarify some technical details here: neovim/neovim#25913 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants