Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Packaging naming guidelines #156

Closed
b1ek opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Packaging naming guidelines #156

b1ek opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@b1ek
Copy link
Member

b1ek commented Jun 6, 2024

so far, we have 2 packages - AUR and nix. the two have different names - amber-bash and amber-lang

the problem will unfold later if more people would package it to different systems with different names.

i propose that we require all future packages to use amber-bash, to avoid name clash with amber-lang.net
@Ph0enixKM
Copy link
Member

@b1ek We should add this to the CONTRIBUTING.md section in #157

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Ph0enixKM @b1ek