Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Java] Build arrow-format and arrow-vector as JPMS modules #38997

Closed
jduo opened this issue Nov 30, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #38995
Closed

[Java] Build arrow-format and arrow-vector as JPMS modules #38997

jduo opened this issue Nov 30, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #38995

Comments

@jduo
Copy link
Member

jduo commented Nov 30, 2023

Describe the enhancement requested

This depends on #38998 and #39134 .

Build the first set of core arrow dependencies as JPMS modules while retaining JDK 8 support.

Note that arrow-vector is effectively unusable without also modularizing arrow-memory-core. Vector allocations call into arrow-memory-core's MemoryUtil class which relies on Unsafe.

Component(s)

Java

jduo added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2024
### Rationale for this change
This PR depends on #39011 .

Make arrow-vector and arrow-format JPMS modules for improved
compatibility with newer JDKs and tools that require modules.

### What changes are included in this PR?
* add module-info.java files for vector and format.

### Are these changes tested?
Yes, these modules are run as JPMS modules in JDK9+ unit tests.

### Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes, some test classes have moved and users can now run these as JPMS
modules.

* Closes: #38997
clayburn pushed a commit to clayburn/arrow that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2024
### Rationale for this change
This PR depends on apache#39011 .

Make arrow-vector and arrow-format JPMS modules for improved
compatibility with newer JDKs and tools that require modules.

### What changes are included in this PR?
* add module-info.java files for vector and format.

### Are these changes tested?
Yes, these modules are run as JPMS modules in JDK9+ unit tests.

### Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes, some test classes have moved and users can now run these as JPMS
modules.

* Closes: apache#38997
dgreiss pushed a commit to dgreiss/arrow that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2024
### Rationale for this change
This PR depends on apache#39011 .

Make arrow-vector and arrow-format JPMS modules for improved
compatibility with newer JDKs and tools that require modules.

### What changes are included in this PR?
* add module-info.java files for vector and format.

### Are these changes tested?
Yes, these modules are run as JPMS modules in JDK9+ unit tests.

### Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes, some test classes have moved and users can now run these as JPMS
modules.

* Closes: apache#38997
zanmato1984 pushed a commit to zanmato1984/arrow that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2024
### Rationale for this change
This PR depends on apache#39011 .

Make arrow-vector and arrow-format JPMS modules for improved
compatibility with newer JDKs and tools that require modules.

### What changes are included in this PR?
* add module-info.java files for vector and format.

### Are these changes tested?
Yes, these modules are run as JPMS modules in JDK9+ unit tests.

### Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes, some test classes have moved and users can now run these as JPMS
modules.

* Closes: apache#38997
thisisnic pushed a commit to thisisnic/arrow that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2024
### Rationale for this change
This PR depends on apache#39011 .

Make arrow-vector and arrow-format JPMS modules for improved
compatibility with newer JDKs and tools that require modules.

### What changes are included in this PR?
* add module-info.java files for vector and format.

### Are these changes tested?
Yes, these modules are run as JPMS modules in JDK9+ unit tests.

### Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes, some test classes have moved and users can now run these as JPMS
modules.

* Closes: apache#38997
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant