Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Native] use atomic status of consumer #318

Closed
xujianhai666 opened this issue Dec 1, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

[Native] use atomic status of consumer #318

xujianhai666 opened this issue Dec 1, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@xujianhai666
Copy link
Member

BUG REPORT
Please add the branch name [Native]/[Master] at the header of the Isssue title.

  1. Please describe the issue you observed:

    • What did you do (The steps to reproduce)?
      status of consumer using atomic

    • What did you expect to see?

    • What did you see instead?

  2. Please tell us about your environment:

    • What is your OS?

    • What is your client version?

    • What is your RocketMQ version?

  3. Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, logs, related issues, suggestions on how to fix, etc):

FEATURE REQUEST

  1. Please describe the feature you are requesting.

  2. Provide any additional detail on your proposed use case for this feature.

  3. Indicate the importance of this issue to you (blocker, must-have, should-have, nice-to-have). Are you currently using any workarounds to address this issue?

  4. If there are some sub-tasks using -[] for each subtask and create a corresponding issue to map to the sub task:

xujianhai666 added a commit to xujianhai666/rocketmq-client-go that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2019
@wenfengwang wenfengwang added this to the 2.0.0-RC1 milestone Dec 2, 2019
@wenfengwang wenfengwang added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 2, 2019
ShannonDing pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2019
@ShannonDing
Copy link
Member

close due to PR #320 merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants