Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[YUNIKORN-2883] Improve sorters & queue_tracker funtion's test coverage #971

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SP12893678
Copy link
Contributor

@SP12893678 SP12893678 commented Sep 20, 2024

What is this PR for?

Improve the following funtion's test coverage:

  • canBeRemoved (child queue Tracker canBeRemovedInternal false case, remove unreachable code)
  • String
  • sortApplicationsBySubmissionTimeAndPriority (left SubmissionTime before right)

What type of PR is it?

  • - Test

What is the Jira issue?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-2883

Copy link
Contributor

@ryankert01 ryankert01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, thank you for the patch. A little question left.

@@ -410,11 +410,7 @@ func (qt *QueueTracker) canRunApp(hierarchy []string, applicationID string, trac
func (qt *QueueTracker) canBeRemoved() bool {
for _, childQT := range qt.childQueueTrackers {
// quick check to avoid further traversal
if childQT.canBeRemovedInternal() {
if !childQT.canBeRemoved() {
Copy link
Contributor

@ryankert01 ryankert01 Sep 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't it meant to do it recursively?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That place seems unreachable.

Copy link
Contributor

@ryankert01 ryankert01 Sep 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you verify it by adding test case with tree that depth >= 3? I think it's for tree traversal

Copy link
Contributor

@ryankert01 ryankert01 Sep 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you mean len(qt.childQueueTrackers) == 0 on L426 cause this?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see how this is going. This function can only remove tree that height=2.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've already discussion about this code with @manirajv06 please involve him as well.

Copy link
Contributor

@ryankert01 ryankert01 Oct 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gentle ping @manirajv06 , are you available to give us some insight?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (master@7337944). Learn more about missing BASE report.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #971   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   81.08%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       97           
  Lines             ?    12522           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    10154           
  Misses            ?     2099           
  Partials          ?      269           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants