Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MT use case and notebook exportation #653

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 23, 2022
Merged

MT use case and notebook exportation #653

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 23, 2022

Conversation

hepengfe
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR creates a tutorial for MT that wraps a T5 model to do MT inference tasks.
It also includes .nbautoexport which is configuration for automatic notebook exportation.

Description of changes

Describe what are the changes, and how they solve the problem.

Possible influences of this PR.

Describe what are the possible side-effects of the code change.

Test Conducted

Describe what test cases are included for the PR.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 23, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #653 (0822dc7) into master (358377e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #653   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.90%   80.90%           
=======================================
  Files         240      240           
  Lines       17362    17362           
=======================================
  Hits        14047    14047           
  Misses       3315     3315           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 358377e...0822dc7. Read the comment docs.

@hepengfe hepengfe marked this pull request as ready for review February 23, 2022 18:39
@hepengfe hepengfe merged commit 7dc6e6c into asyml:master Feb 23, 2022
@hepengfe hepengfe deleted the MT_use_case branch February 23, 2022 18:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants