Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spec 3.0 Meeting, 16:00 UTC Wednesday May 11th 2022 #346

Closed
asyncapi-bot opened this issue Apr 28, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Spec 3.0 Meeting, 16:00 UTC Wednesday May 11th 2022 #346

asyncapi-bot opened this issue Apr 28, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

asyncapi-bot commented Apr 28, 2022

Meeting Info Details
Purpose This is the meeting for community member involved in works related to 3.0 release of AsyncAPI Specification.
Time 16:00 UTC | Translate to your time zone with the time zone converter.
Meeting Place Link
Zoom Join the discussion live.
YouTube Watch live and interact through live chat.
Twitch Watch live.
Twitter Watch live.
LinkedIn Watch live.
More Info Details
Meeting Recordings YouTube Playlist.
AsyncAPI Initiative Calendar Public URL.
iCal File Add to your calendar.
Newsletter Subscribe to get weekly updates on upcoming meetings.

Agenda

Don't wait for the meeting to discuss topics that already have issues. Feel free to comment on them earlier.

  1. Q&A
  2. Discussion around what it means to define an API, i.e. a change of perspective for AsyncAPI - @jonaslagoni
  3. How can we make sure we define the scope of AsyncAPI to an acceptable extent? What would that require? - @jonaslagoni
  4. Should we move JSON Schema files for bindings, Move binding JSON schema files to main JSON schema repository bindings#113 - @jonaslagoni
  5. [3.0.0] Introduce Info Item Object spec#795 - @magicmatatjahu
  6. Place for your topic
  7. Q&A

Notes

Add notes here after the meeting.

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

In case you missed it, @fmvilas and @lbroudoux had a great conversation about the spec 3.0 in Thinking Out Loud. One specific aspect I think would be great to discuss at the next meeting, which revolves around the scope of AsyncAPI.

I would like to bring up the following questions for discussion:

  1. Discussion around what it means to define an API, i.e. a change of perspective for AsyncAPI.
  2. How can we make sure we define the scope of AsyncAPI to an acceptable extent? What would that require?

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

I think it makes sense to bring up asyncapi/bindings#113. Then we can see if it will require a dedicated call to move it forward as there is a couple of things to consider 😄

@magicmatatjahu
Copy link
Member

@jonaslagoni Could you add my topic? asyncapi/spec#795

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

As discussed in the meeting the following talking points will be copied to the next meeting.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants