You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using this template the output file contains reply information that differs semantically from the output of the html template
Markdown output
Request information
request should be done to channel: pong
That's somehow confusing, because pong is the channel i want to read the response from.
The given message suggest i should send my request to the pong channel, which is wrong.
This happens with send-operations.
receive-operations give this information:
reply should be done to channel: pong
Which makes more sense. (Although the HTML output is still more clear to me)
I want to add that I'm not entirely sure i understood the reply feature correctly. But according to Doc: Adding reply info and when inspecting the html output, i think it makes sense.
Expected behavior
The expected markdown output should match the HTML output in the context of reply information
HTML output:
REPLY CHANNEL INFORMATION
Reply will be provided via this designated address: pong
Because it tells me on which channel the response can be read from.
Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request. Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.
Describe the bug.
AsyncAPI (3.0.0)
When using this template the output file contains reply information that differs semantically from the output of the html template
Markdown output
That's somehow confusing, because pong is the channel i want to read the response from.
The given message suggest i should send my request to the pong channel, which is wrong.
This happens with send-operations.
receive-operations give this information:
Which makes more sense. (Although the HTML output is still more clear to me)
I want to add that I'm not entirely sure i understood the reply feature correctly. But according to Doc: Adding reply info and when inspecting the html output, i think it makes sense.
Expected behavior
The expected markdown output should match the HTML output in the context of reply information
HTML output:
Because it tells me on which channel the response can be read from.
Screenshots
Files: files.zip
markdown-template
html-template
How to Reproduce
🥦 Browser
Mozilla Firefox
👀 Have you checked for similar open issues?
🏢 Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?
Are you willing to work on this issue ?
No, someone else can work on it
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: