Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make it easier to access the raw types from code generators #640

Closed
jonaslagoni opened this issue Feb 14, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Make it easier to access the raw types from code generators #640

jonaslagoni opened this issue Feb 14, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

jonaslagoni commented Feb 14, 2022

Reason/Context

If you create templates for the AsyncAPI generator, you often find yourself in the need of knowing the payload type of a message.

For example, if I want to generate something like:

publishToChannel(message MyMessage) {
  ...
}

I would need to template it like so:

publishToChannel(message <<INSERT MESSAGE TYPE>>) {
  ...
}

Currently, accessing the message type, if models are generated with Modelina, is not that straightforward, especially if we talk about primitive types.

I think #530 might solve it, as your model directly have access to something like model.type.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member Author

Solved in the next branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant