Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add reply() to the Operation model #834

Merged

Conversation

smoya
Copy link
Member

@smoya smoya commented Aug 10, 2023

Description

Fixes #831.

Related issue(s)
#831

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 10, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

/rtm

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot merged commit b82b150 into asyncapi:next-major-spec Aug 10, 2023
20 checks passed
@smoya smoya deleted the fix/missingOperationReply branch August 10, 2023 10:35
@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.1.0-next-major-spec.6 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.2.0-next-major-spec.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants