Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update validation on GitHub token #155

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

adamnolte
Copy link
Contributor

@adamnolte adamnolte commented Oct 9, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added validation for the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable to ensure it is a valid, non-empty string before posting comments to GitHub.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for GitHub token parsing failures, with appropriate warning and informational messages logged.
  • Documentation

    • Updated logging messages for clarity regarding the operations related to GitHub integration.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2024

🏗️ E2E / py-no-cli-runner (#1362)  •  ➡️ View in Autoblocks


🟢  python-e2e-test-suite-1-no-cli-runner    x = "x1"  y = "y1"

Evaluators               Min / Avg / Max    Pass / Fail / Skip
--------------------------------------------------------------
has-all-substrings    1.00 / 1.00 / 1.00             4 / 0 / 0
is-friendly           0.27 / 0.43 / 0.53             3 / 0 / 1

Test Case Duration
Min: 166.03ms / Avg: 374.52ms / Max: 594.48ms
 
 
🟢  python-e2e-test-suite-1-no-cli-runner    x = "x2"  y = "y1"

Evaluators               Min / Avg / Max    Pass / Fail / Skip
--------------------------------------------------------------
has-all-substrings    1.00 / 1.00 / 1.00             4 / 0 / 0
is-friendly           0.48 / 0.68 / 0.92             4 / 0 / 0

Test Case Duration
Min: 150.47ms / Avg: 321.63ms / Max: 623.24ms
 
 
🔴  python-e2e-test-suite-2-no-cli-runner

Evaluators               Min / Avg / Max    Pass / Fail / Skip
--------------------------------------------------------------
has-all-substrings    0.00 / 0.80 / 1.00             8 / 2 / 0
is-friendly           0.08 / 0.62 / 0.97             8 / 0 / 2

Test Case Duration
Min: 176.36ms / Avg: 621.61ms / Max: 897.68ms
 
 

Generated by Autoblocks against 8c60df7

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2024

🏗️ E2E / ts (#1371)  •  ➡️ View in Autoblocks


🔴  typescript-e2e-test-suite-1-with-cli-runner

Evaluators               Min / Avg / Max    Pass / Fail / Skip
--------------------------------------------------------------
has-all-substrings    0.00 / 0.50 / 1.00             2 / 2 / 0
is-friendly           0.19 / 0.64 / 0.87             4 / 0 / 0

Test Case Duration
Min: 116.73ms / Avg: 512.09ms / Max: 801.75ms
 
 
🟢  typescript-e2e-test-suite-2-with-cli-runner

Evaluators               Min / Avg / Max    Pass / Fail / Skip
--------------------------------------------------------------
has-all-substrings    1.00 / 1.00 / 1.00            10 / 0 / 0
is-friendly           0.02 / 0.51 / 0.96            10 / 0 / 0

Test Case Duration
Min: 0.19ms / Avg: 432.61ms / Max: 888.14ms
 
 

Generated by Autoblocks against 065d83f

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2024

🏗️ E2E / py (#1362)  •  ➡️ View in Autoblocks


🔴  python-e2e-test-suite-1-with-cli-runner    x = "x1"  y = "y1"

Evaluators               Min / Avg / Max    Pass / Fail / Skip
--------------------------------------------------------------
has-all-substrings    0.00 / 0.75 / 1.00             3 / 1 / 0
is-friendly           0.11 / 0.49 / 0.91             3 / 0 / 1

Test Case Duration
Min: 384.58ms / Avg: 721.20ms / Max: 981.02ms
 
 
🔴  python-e2e-test-suite-1-with-cli-runner    x = "x2"  y = "y1"

Evaluators               Min / Avg / Max    Pass / Fail / Skip
--------------------------------------------------------------
has-all-substrings    0.00 / 0.50 / 1.00             2 / 2 / 0
is-friendly           0.26 / 0.41 / 0.56             2 / 0 / 2

Test Case Duration
Min: 208.36ms / Avg: 450.67ms / Max: 557.89ms
 
 
🔴  python-e2e-test-suite-2-with-cli-runner

Evaluators               Min / Avg / Max    Pass / Fail / Skip
--------------------------------------------------------------
has-all-substrings    0.00 / 0.80 / 1.00             8 / 2 / 0
is-friendly           0.02 / 0.53 / 0.77             8 / 0 / 2

Test Case Duration
Min: 54.16ms / Avg: 544.62ms / Max: 994.38ms
 
 

Generated by Autoblocks against 8c60df7

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2024

🏗️ E2E / ts-no-cli-runner (#1371)  •  ➡️ View in Autoblocks


🟢  typescript-e2e-test-suite-1-no-cli-runner

Evaluators               Min / Avg / Max    Pass / Fail / Skip
--------------------------------------------------------------
has-all-substrings    1.00 / 1.00 / 1.00             4 / 0 / 0
is-friendly           0.08 / 0.64 / 0.98             4 / 0 / 0

Test Case Duration
Min: 204.04ms / Avg: 521.67ms / Max: 977.17ms
 
 
🔴  typescript-e2e-test-suite-2-no-cli-runner

Evaluators               Min / Avg / Max    Pass / Fail / Skip
--------------------------------------------------------------
has-all-substrings    0.00 / 0.70 / 1.00             7 / 3 / 0
is-friendly           0.20 / 0.54 / 0.98            10 / 0 / 0

Test Case Duration
Min: 268.52ms / Avg: 608.18ms / Max: 930.32ms
 
 

Generated by Autoblocks against 065d83f

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the RunManager class within the src/handlers/testing/exec/util/run-manager.ts file. A validation step has been added to ensure the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable is a non-empty string using the zod library. The code now checks the success of this validation before posting comments to GitHub. Additionally, logging messages have been updated to reflect these changes, improving error handling and validation without altering the overall structure of the class.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/handlers/testing/exec/util/run-manager.ts Added validation for GITHUB_TOKEN using zod, replaced direct usage with parsed version, updated logging messages.

Possibly related PRs

  • Enable support for codefresh #151: The changes in the main PR enhance the GitHub comment posting functionality, which is directly related to the modifications in the src/handlers/testing/exec/util/run-manager.ts file, where the logic for posting GitHub comments has been updated.

Suggested reviewers

  • haroonchoudery

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/handlers/testing/exec/util/run-manager.ts (1)

Line range hint 733-772: Improved GitHub token validation and error handling

The changes to the postComments method significantly improve the handling of the GITHUB_TOKEN:

  1. Using zod for parsing and validation ensures the token is a non-empty string.
  2. Explicit handling of cases where the token is invalid or missing improves error management.
  3. Appropriate log messages for different scenarios enhance debugging capabilities.

These improvements make the GitHub integration more robust and user-friendly.

Consider extracting the GitHub token validation logic into a separate method for better code organization and reusability. For example:

private validateGithubToken(): z.SafeParseReturnType<string, string> {
  return z
    .string()
    .trim()
    .min(1)
    .safeParse(process.env.GITHUB_TOKEN);
}

Then, in the postComments method:

const githubToken = this.validateGithubToken();

This change would improve code readability and make it easier to reuse the validation logic if needed elsewhere in the class.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d7f031 and 8c60df7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/handlers/testing/exec/util/run-manager.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used

@adamnolte adamnolte merged commit 065d83f into main Oct 9, 2024
13 checks passed
@adamnolte adamnolte deleted the update-validation-on-github-token branch October 9, 2024 16:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants