-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
aws_cognito: UserPoolIdentityProviderOidc doesn't support SecretValue for client secret #29851
Open
1 of 2 tasks
Labels
@aws-cdk/aws-cognito
Related to Amazon Cognito
effort/small
Small work item – less than a day of effort
feature-request
A feature should be added or improved.
p3
Comments
guillaume-mindflow
added
feature-request
A feature should be added or improved.
needs-triage
This issue or PR still needs to be triaged.
labels
Apr 16, 2024
khushail
added
p2
effort/small
Small work item – less than a day of effort
and removed
needs-triage
This issue or PR still needs to be triaged.
labels
Apr 16, 2024
thanks @guillaume-mindflow for volunteering for PR contrinbution. |
This was referenced Apr 22, 2024
1 task
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
@aws-cdk/aws-cognito
Related to Amazon Cognito
effort/small
Small work item – less than a day of effort
feature-request
A feature should be added or improved.
p3
Describe the feature
Hello,
Small FR that would make the use of SecretValue more straightforward.
UserPoolIdentityProviderOidc
needs a client secret value for deployment. As of now it only supportsstring
value.Compared to the generic one like
UserPoolIdentityProviderGoogle
who supportclientSecretValue
.Use Case
It would make the DX a bit better, simplifying the resolution. And also align with the other providers from the cognito package.
Proposed Solution
No response
Other Information
No response
Acknowledgements
CDK version used
2.131.0
Environment details (OS name and version, etc.)
MacOS
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: