Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update taxonomy expert and harmonization to reflect current RSIT #1476

Closed

Conversation

th-certbund
Copy link
Contributor

Update taxonomy expert and harmonization to reflect current RSIT

@ghost ghost added this to the 2.2.0 milestone Mar 23, 2020
@ghost ghost self-assigned this Mar 23, 2020
@ghost ghost added bug Indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior data-format labels Mar 23, 2020
"blacklist": "other",
"other": "other", # not in ENISA eCSIRT-II taxonomy
"c2-server": "malicious-code",
"dga-domain": "malicious-code", # not in ENISA eCSIRT-II taxonomy
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as long as this type is not in RSIT we don't know the final name anyway. to avoid double renaming, I change it back here for now

@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Mar 24, 2020
16 tasks
Comment on lines +65 to +66
"vulnerable-client": "vulnerable", # not in ENISA eCSIRT-II taxonomy
"vulnerable-service": "vulnerable", # not in ENISA eCSIRT-II taxonomy
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The correct RSIT type is actually vulnerable-system for both vulnerable client and vulnerable service

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 24, 2020

Merged into branch develop-3.0

@ghost ghost closed this Mar 24, 2020
@ghost ghost modified the milestones: 2.2.0, 3.0.0 Mar 24, 2020
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior data-format
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant