Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Erikcorry roll v8 13.0 (#2918)" #2937

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

AdityaAtulTewari
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts commit 2160e96.

@@ -22,9 +22,8 @@ class V8PlatformWrapper: public v8::Platform {
return inner.NumberOfWorkerThreads();
}

std::shared_ptr<v8::TaskRunner> GetForegroundTaskRunner(
Copy link
Collaborator

@fhanau fhanau Oct 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of repeatedly rolling this change back and forth, can't we just keep the update and use #if V8_MAJOR_VERSION >= 13 to select between both versions so that the internal build just works with either V8 release? Otherwise I have to recompile almost everything for workerd whenever we roll this back/reland it. Having a temporary version mismatch should be acceptable as long as it won't be for extended time frames.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this something to be added now, or can it be added into the next attempt to reintroduce this change?

Copy link
Collaborator

@fhanau fhanau Oct 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we had added it now, we would not have had to do the revert at all

@AdityaAtulTewari AdityaAtulTewari merged commit cfb334a into main Oct 16, 2024
13 checks passed
@AdityaAtulTewari AdityaAtulTewari deleted the atewari/revert-v8-update branch October 16, 2024 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants