feat: make the webhook port configurable #301
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Oct 11, 2024
Signed-off-by: Argannor <[email protected]>
Argannor
force-pushed
the
configurable-port
branch
from
2d2306f
to
3fb096f
Compare
ravilr
reviewed
Oct 13, 2024
| @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ func main() { | |||
| leaderElection = app.Flag("leader-election", "Use leader election for the controller manager.").Short('l').Default("false").Envar("LEADER_ELECTION").Bool() | |||
| maxReconcileRate = app.Flag("max-reconcile-rate", "The number of concurrent reconciliations that may be running at one time.").Default("100").Int() | |||
| sanitizeSecrets = app.Flag("sanitize-secrets", "when enabled, redacts Secret data from Object status").Default("false").Envar("SANITIZE_SECRETS").Bool() | |||
| webhookPort = app.Flag("webhook-port", "The port the webhook listens on").Default("9443").Envar("WEBHOOK_PORT").Int() | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
for all providers, also allow configuring metrics bind address which gets passed onto sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/metrics/server.Options ?
we can standardize on --webhook-port and --metrics-bind-address flags across all providers, similar to crossplane core flags..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
+1 for standardizing. I added the --metrics-bind-address as well as requested. Thank you for the feedback!
Signed-off-by: Argannor <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of your changes
As outlined in the issue below, when running Crossplane in certain environments (like EKS using Calico CNI), where the control plane resides outside the workload network it is necessary to run webhooks in the host network. This calls for the need to make the port configurable to avoid conflicts.
I opened crossplane/crossplane!5540 to allow a
DeploymentRuntimeConfigto overwrite the ports of the crossplane managed services created for each provider / function.Fixes #208
I have:
make reviewable testto ensure this PR is ready for review.How has this code been tested
I deployed my fork of this and crossplane in our test cluster running EKS and Calico. With this I was able to run both Crossplane and provider-kubernetes inside the host network with custom ports.
This change only makes sense if my other PR gets accepted.