Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CT-1783] [Bug] AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'replace' when logging a dict if an DBT_ENV_SECRET_ env var is set #6568

Closed
2 tasks done
jeremyyeo opened this issue Jan 10, 2023 · 7 comments · Fixed by #7249
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working logging

Comments

@jeremyyeo
Copy link
Contributor

Is this a new bug in dbt-core?

  • I believe this is a new bug in dbt-core
  • I have searched the existing issues, and I could not find an existing issue for this bug

Current Behavior

If you set a secret env var DBT_ENV_SECRET_x and try to log a dict (not related to the env var at all), you run into an error:

AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'replace'

Expected Behavior

No errors when logging dicts even with secret env vars.

Steps To Reproduce

  1. Project setup.
# dbt_project.yml
name: my_dbt_project
profile: snowflake
config-version: 2
version: 1.0

models:
  my_dbt_project:
    +materialized: table
-- models/foo.sql

select 1 as id
{{ my_macro() }}

-- macros/my_macro.sql

{% macro my_macro() %}
    {% set val = {'foo': 1} %}
    {% do log(val, True) %}
{% endmacro %}
  1. Make sure there are no secret dbt env vars set and do a run.
$ printenv | grep DBT_ENV_SECRET
$ dbt run
23:00:35  Running with dbt=1.3.2
23:00:35  {'foo': 1}
23:00:35  Found 1 model, 0 tests, 0 snapshots, 0 analyses, 304 macros, 0 operations, 0 seed files, 0 sources, 0 exposures, 0 metrics
23:00:35  
23:00:42  Concurrency: 8 threads (target='dev')
23:00:42  
23:00:42  1 of 1 START sql table model dbt_jyeo.foo ...................................... [RUN]
23:00:42  {'foo': 1}
23:00:46  1 of 1 OK created sql table model dbt_jyeo.foo ................................. [SUCCESS 1 in 3.93s]
23:00:46  
23:00:46  Finished running 1 table model in 0 hours 0 minutes and 10.45 seconds (10.45s).
23:00:46  
23:00:46  Completed successfully
23:00:46  
23:00:46  Done. PASS=1 WARN=0 ERROR=0 SKIP=0 TOTAL=1
  1. Set an env var and then rerun.
$ export DBT_ENV_SECRET_FOO=topsecret
$ dbt run
23:01:26  Running with dbt=1.3.2
23:01:28  Encountered an error:
'dict' object has no attribute 'replace'
23:01:28  Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/main.py", line 135, in main
    results, succeeded = handle_and_check(args)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/main.py", line 198, in handle_and_check
    task, res = run_from_args(parsed)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/main.py", line 245, in run_from_args
    results = task.run()
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/task/runnable.py", line 453, in run
    self._runtime_initialize()
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/task/runnable.py", line 161, in _runtime_initialize
    super()._runtime_initialize()
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/task/runnable.py", line 94, in _runtime_initialize
    self.load_manifest()
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/task/runnable.py", line 81, in load_manifest
    self.manifest = ManifestLoader.get_full_manifest(self.config)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/parser/manifest.py", line 221, in get_full_manifest
    manifest = loader.load()
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/parser/manifest.py", line 351, in load
    self.parse_project(
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/parser/manifest.py", line 479, in parse_project
    parser.parse_file(block)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/parser/base.py", line 414, in parse_file
    self.parse_node(file_block)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/parser/base.py", line 388, in parse_node
    self.render_update(node, config)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/parser/models.py", line 337, in render_update
    super().render_update(node, config)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/parser/base.py", line 363, in render_update
    context = self.render_with_context(node, config)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/parser/base.py", line 242, in render_with_context
    get_rendered(parsed_node.raw_code, context, parsed_node, capture_macros=True)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/clients/jinja.py", line 587, in get_rendered
    return render_template(template, ctx, node)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/clients/jinja.py", line 542, in render_template
    return template.render(ctx)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 1301, in render
    self.environment.handle_exception()
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/jinja2/environment.py", line 936, in handle_exception
    raise rewrite_traceback_stack(source=source)
  File "<template>", line 2, in top-level template code
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/jinja2/sandbox.py", line 393, in call
    return __context.call(__obj, *args, **kwargs)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/clients/jinja.py", line 326, in __call__
    return self.call_macro(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/clients/jinja.py", line 253, in call_macro
    return macro(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/jinja2/runtime.py", line 777, in _invoke
    rv = self._func(*arguments)
  File "<template>", line 3, in template
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/jinja2/sandbox.py", line 393, in call
    return __context.call(__obj, *args, **kwargs)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/context/base.py", line 560, in log
    fire_event(MacroEventInfo(msg=msg))
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/events/functions.py", line 275, in fire_event
    log_line = create_log_line(e, file_output=True)
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/events/functions.py", line 206, in create_log_line
    return create_debug_text_log_line(e)  # default file output
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/events/functions.py", line 179, in create_debug_text_log_line
    scrubbed_msg: str = scrub_secrets(e.message(), env_secrets())
  File "/Users/jeremy/src/dbt-sandcastles/venv_dbt_latest/lib/python3.8/site-packages/dbt/events/functions.py", line 116, in scrub_secrets
    scrubbed = scrubbed.replace(secret, "*****")
AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'replace'

Relevant log output

See above.

Environment

- OS: macOS
- Python: 3.8
- dbt: 1.3.2

Which database adapter are you using with dbt?

snowflake

Additional Context

We should stringify scrubbed.

@jeremyyeo jeremyyeo added bug Something isn't working triage labels Jan 10, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title [Bug] AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'replace' when logging a dict if an DBT_ENV_SECRET_ env var is set [CT-1783] [Bug] AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'replace' when logging a dict if an DBT_ENV_SECRET_ env var is set Jan 10, 2023
@jtcohen6
Copy link
Contributor

This looks familiar: #5385

Was meant to be resolved by: #5874

@dbeatty10
Copy link
Contributor

dbeatty10 commented Jan 19, 2023

An idea to fix this

I didn't actually test this out, but I suspect that changing return self.msg to return str(self.msg) in both places here might fix this. Seeing e.message() here is what lead me to guess down this path.

An alternative might be changing msg=msg to msg=str(msg) here.

Or we could do both!

In the big-picture, there's very few def message(self) method defintions within core/dbt/events/types.py that aren't explicitly cast to a string. (I quickly read through all 220+ of them!) As part of this effort, we could ensure that all of them are explicitly cast to strings.

Functional testing

It looks like it would be pretty easy to convert @jeremyyeo's reproduction case into a functional test to prevent an accidental regression.

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 removed the triage label Jan 19, 2023
@lsabreu96
Copy link

Any updates on this ?
I'm believing I'm facing a similar issue in the same environment, but I'm using Ubuntu rather than macOs. The error is

Encountered an error while running operation: 'AttributeError' object has no attribute 'replace'

I was trying to perform a run-operation and this error popped up. I removed all the DBT_ENV vars and rerun and it worked just fine.

The original macro being called had a legacy logging step, which queried the database, fetched the values and then printed'em out. After removing the logging, the macro ran just fine.

@dbeatty10
Copy link
Contributor

@lsabreu96 Glad you found a workaround!

We don't have any updates on when a fix for this will be released.

But I think there's a couple ways to solve it (neither of which I have actually tested):

  1. here, change return self.msg to return str(self.msg) in both places
  2. here, change msg=msg to msg=str(msg)

(We could do both.)

@jtcohen6
Copy link
Contributor

jtcohen6 commented Mar 3, 2023

here, change msg=msg to msg=str(msg)

This seems like the Correct approach to me, given the promised return type of this function:

def log(msg: str, info: bool = False) -> str:

If users want the ability to log more structured data (not just a string), that's a different feature request:

@gshank
Copy link
Contributor

gshank commented Mar 22, 2023

I ran into a related error in the protobuf branch and put a "str" cast around the "msg" in scrub_secrets. So that might have fixed this. In a more general sense, the "msg" in exceptions should probably always be a string...

QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 31, 2023
[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2023
…ing (#7249)

* Add tests for logging jinja2.Undefined objects

[CT-2259](#7108) identifies
an issue wherein dbt-core 1.0-1.3 raise errors if a jinja2.Undefined
object is attempted to be logged. This generally happened in the form
of `{{ log(undefined_variable, info=True) }}`. This commit adding this
test exists for two reasons
1. Ensure we don't have a regression in this going forward
2. Exist as a commit to be used for backport fixes for dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add tests for checking `DBT_ENV_SECRET_`s don't break logging

[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add tests ensuring failed event serialization is handled correctly

[CT-2264](#7113) states
that failed serialization should result in an exception handling path
which will fire another event instead of raising an exception. This is
hard to test perfectly because the exception handling path for
serialization depending on whether pytest is present. If pytest isn't
present, a new event documentation the failed serialization is fired.
If pytest is present, the failed serialization gets raised as an exception.
Thus this added test ensures that the expected exception is raised and
assumes that the correct event will be fired normally.

* Log warning when event serialization fails in `msg_to_dict`

This commit updates the `msg_to_dict` exception handling path to
fire a warning level event instead of raising an exception.
Truthfully, we're not sure if this exception handling path is even
possible to hit. That's because we recently switched from betterproto
to google's protobuf. However, exception path is the subject of
[CT-2264](#7113). Though we
don't think it's actually possible to hit it anymore, we still want
to handle the case if it is.

* Update serialization failure note to be a warn level event in `BaseEvent`

[CT-2264](#7113) wants
logging messages about event serialization failure to be `WARNING`
level events. This does that.

* Add changie info for changes

* Add test to check exception handling of `msg_to_dict`
emmyoop pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2023
…ing (#7249)

* Add tests for logging jinja2.Undefined objects

[CT-2259](#7108) identifies
an issue wherein dbt-core 1.0-1.3 raise errors if a jinja2.Undefined
object is attempted to be logged. This generally happened in the form
of `{{ log(undefined_variable, info=True) }}`. This commit adding this
test exists for two reasons
1. Ensure we don't have a regression in this going forward
2. Exist as a commit to be used for backport fixes for dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add tests for checking `DBT_ENV_SECRET_`s don't break logging

[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add tests ensuring failed event serialization is handled correctly

[CT-2264](#7113) states
that failed serialization should result in an exception handling path
which will fire another event instead of raising an exception. This is
hard to test perfectly because the exception handling path for
serialization depending on whether pytest is present. If pytest isn't
present, a new event documentation the failed serialization is fired.
If pytest is present, the failed serialization gets raised as an exception.
Thus this added test ensures that the expected exception is raised and
assumes that the correct event will be fired normally.

* Log warning when event serialization fails in `msg_to_dict`

This commit updates the `msg_to_dict` exception handling path to
fire a warning level event instead of raising an exception.
Truthfully, we're not sure if this exception handling path is even
possible to hit. That's because we recently switched from betterproto
to google's protobuf. However, exception path is the subject of
[CT-2264](#7113). Though we
don't think it's actually possible to hit it anymore, we still want
to handle the case if it is.

* Update serialization failure note to be a warn level event in `BaseEvent`

[CT-2264](#7113) wants
logging messages about event serialization failure to be `WARNING`
level events. This does that.

* Add changie info for changes

* Add test to check exception handling of `msg_to_dict`
emmyoop pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2023
…ing (#7249)

* Add tests for logging jinja2.Undefined objects

[CT-2259](#7108) identifies
an issue wherein dbt-core 1.0-1.3 raise errors if a jinja2.Undefined
object is attempted to be logged. This generally happened in the form
of `{{ log(undefined_variable, info=True) }}`. This commit adding this
test exists for two reasons
1. Ensure we don't have a regression in this going forward
2. Exist as a commit to be used for backport fixes for dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add tests for checking `DBT_ENV_SECRET_`s don't break logging

[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add tests ensuring failed event serialization is handled correctly

[CT-2264](#7113) states
that failed serialization should result in an exception handling path
which will fire another event instead of raising an exception. This is
hard to test perfectly because the exception handling path for
serialization depending on whether pytest is present. If pytest isn't
present, a new event documentation the failed serialization is fired.
If pytest is present, the failed serialization gets raised as an exception.
Thus this added test ensures that the expected exception is raised and
assumes that the correct event will be fired normally.

* Log warning when event serialization fails in `msg_to_dict`

This commit updates the `msg_to_dict` exception handling path to
fire a warning level event instead of raising an exception.
Truthfully, we're not sure if this exception handling path is even
possible to hit. That's because we recently switched from betterproto
to google's protobuf. However, exception path is the subject of
[CT-2264](#7113). Though we
don't think it's actually possible to hit it anymore, we still want
to handle the case if it is.

* Update serialization failure note to be a warn level event in `BaseEvent`

[CT-2264](#7113) wants
logging messages about event serialization failure to be `WARNING`
level events. This does that.

* Add changie info for changes

* Add test to check exception handling of `msg_to_dict`
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2023
…ing (#7249)

* Add tests for logging jinja2.Undefined objects

[CT-2259](#7108) identifies
an issue wherein dbt-core 1.0-1.3 raise errors if a jinja2.Undefined
object is attempted to be logged. This generally happened in the form
of `{{ log(undefined_variable, info=True) }}`. This commit adding this
test exists for two reasons
1. Ensure we don't have a regression in this going forward
2. Exist as a commit to be used for backport fixes for dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add tests for checking `DBT_ENV_SECRET_`s don't break logging

[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Log warning when event serialization fails in `msg_to_dict`

This commit updates the `msg_to_dict` exception handling path to
fire a warning level event instead of raising an exception.
Truthfully, we're not sure if this exception handling path is even
possible to hit. That's because we recently switched from betterproto
to google's protobuf. However, exception path is the subject of
[CT-2264](#7113). Though we
don't think it's actually possible to hit it anymore, we still want
to handle the case if it is.

* Add changie info for changes

* Add test to check exception handling of `msg_to_dict`
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2023
[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2023
[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2023
The simplest way to resolve [CT-2259](#7108)
and [CT-1783](#6568) in backports
to dbt-core < 1.4 is to ensure `msg` in `BaseContext.log()` is stringified.
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2023
[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2023
The simplest way to resolve [CT-2259](#7108)
and [CT-1783](#6568) in backports
to dbt-core < 1.4 is to ensure `msg` in `BaseContext.log()` is stringified.
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2023
[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2023
The simplest way to resolve [CT-2259](#7108)
and [CT-1783](#6568) in backports
to dbt-core < 1.4 is to ensure `msg` in `BaseContext.log()` is stringified.
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2023
[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2023
The simplest way to resolve [CT-2259](#7108)
and [CT-1783](#6568) in backports
to dbt-core < 1.4 is to ensure `msg` in `BaseContext.log()` is stringified.
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2023
* Add tests for logging jinja2.Undefined objects

[CT-2259](#7108) identifies
an issue wherein dbt-core 1.0-1.3 raise errors if a jinja2.Undefined
object is attempted to be logged. This generally happened in the form
of `{{ log(undefined_variable, info=True) }}`. This commit adding this
test exists for two reasons
1. Ensure we don't have a regression in this going forward
2. Exist as a commit to be used for backport fixes for dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add tests for checking `DBT_ENV_SECRET_`s don't break logging

[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Log warning when event serialization fails in `msg_to_dict`

This commit updates the `msg_to_dict` exception handling path to
fire a warning level event instead of raising an exception.

* Add changie info for changes

* Add test to check exception handling of `msg_to_dict`

* Ensure all events with self.msg stringify self.msg

---------

Co-authored-by: leahwicz <[email protected]>
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2023
* Add tests for logging jinja2.Undefined objects

[CT-2259](#7108) identifies
an issue wherein dbt-core 1.0-1.3 raise errors if a jinja2.Undefined
object is attempted to be logged. This generally happened in the form
of `{{ log(undefined_variable, info=True) }}`. This commit adding this
test exists for two reasons
1. Ensure we don't have a regression in this going forward
2. Exist as a commit to be used for backport fixes for dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add tests for checking `DBT_ENV_SECRET_`s don't break logging

[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add changie info for changes

* Ensure `log()` calls from jinja ensure the msg is stringified

The simplest way to resolve [CT-2259](#7108)
and [CT-1783](#6568) in backports
to dbt-core < 1.4 is to ensure `msg` in `BaseContext.log()` is stringified.

---------

Co-authored-by: leahwicz <[email protected]>
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2023
* Add tests for logging jinja2.Undefined objects

[CT-2259](#7108) identifies
an issue wherein dbt-core 1.0-1.3 raise errors if a jinja2.Undefined
object is attempted to be logged. This generally happened in the form
of `{{ log(undefined_variable, info=True) }}`. This commit adding this
test exists for two reasons
1. Ensure we don't have a regression in this going forward
2. Exist as a commit to be used for backport fixes for dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add tests for checking `DBT_ENV_SECRET_`s don't break logging

[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add changie info for changes

* Ensure `log()` calls from jinja ensure the msg is stringified

The simplest way to resolve [CT-2259](#7108)
and [CT-1783](#6568) in backports
to dbt-core < 1.4 is to ensure `msg` in `BaseContext.log()` is stringified.

---------

Co-authored-by: leahwicz <[email protected]>
QMalcolm added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2023
* Add tests for logging jinja2.Undefined objects

[CT-2259](#7108) identifies
an issue wherein dbt-core 1.0-1.3 raise errors if a jinja2.Undefined
object is attempted to be logged. This generally happened in the form
of `{{ log(undefined_variable, info=True) }}`. This commit adding this
test exists for two reasons
1. Ensure we don't have a regression in this going forward
2. Exist as a commit to be used for backport fixes for dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add tests for checking `DBT_ENV_SECRET_`s don't break logging

[CT-1783](#6568) describes
a bug in dbt-core 1.0-1.3 wherein when a `DBT_ENV_SECRET_` all
`{{ log("logging stuff", info=True) }}` invocations break. This commit
adds a test for this for two reasons:
1. Ensure we don't regress to this behavior going forward
2. Act as a base commit for making the backport fixes to dbt-core 1.0-1.3

* Add changie info for changes

* Ensure `log()` calls from jinja ensure the msg is stringified

The simplest way to resolve [CT-2259](#7108)
and [CT-1783](#6568) in backports
to dbt-core < 1.4 is to ensure `msg` in `BaseContext.log()` is stringified.
@ninasalvesen
Copy link

ninasalvesen commented Jun 30, 2023

I see that this issue is fixed, but I had a similar problem that might be related somehow. I got a compilation error when running 'dbt test' in my project saying

Compilation error: 'dict object' has no attribute 'except' 

for all my unit tests using 'expect()', which was really confusing since the test did not have any except-clause but only expect. Used quite some time to debug what was happening. Came across this issue and thought maybe it had something to do with my environment variable, so I added again to my .zshrc-file (deleted the old line and rewrote again) and ran in terminal

export DBT_PROFILES_DIR="Users/nina/.dbt/"

and somehow that fixed it 🤷‍♀️
I had "~/.dbt/" instead of explicit path before, which might had something to do with it, but it was working fine before until it suddenly didn't.. It could be because of an update from dbt but I had not updated the package before I got the issue either. Thought I would comment either way in case someone else get this problem and could use some debugging tips that worked for me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working logging
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

7 participants