-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
minif2f-Isabella acc #30
Comments
I also tried to reproduce the same results as @wangzhihao-coder without using docker. When following the tutorial in PISA, I encountered a mismatch of the package version in SBT. After fixing it, I started the PISA server successfully. However, the evaluation results (miniF2F-Isabelle-test: 21.72, miniF2F-Isabelle-valid: 22.13) were also worse than those mentioned in the paper. Is there anyone who can help? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I use the docker image from the PISA repository and the prediction file from output.zip of your repository(path/outputs/DeepSeekMath-Base/miniF2F-Isabelle-test/results/cot/predictions.json). But my acc is about 10% compared to the result of 24.6%. I'd like to know what is the reason for this difference.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: