Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid string/StringBuilder/char[] allocation in LogValuesFormatter's ctor #44746
Avoid string/StringBuilder/char[] allocation in LogValuesFormatter's ctor #44746
Changes from all commits
51a09ad
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be worth delaying this Substring alloc?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Delaying it to when?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Delaying it until the string is actually used.
https://source.dot.net/#Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions/LogValuesFormatter.cs,a31f3c3b2cea5615,references
I am not super familiar with this area, but if we only captured the Ranges here, and returned the
_valueNames
asReadOnlyMemory<char>
, maybe we could save alloc'ing these asstring
s all together?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this is likely, then yeah, we should consider that. But I have no idea how common that is (and if it's at all common, it'll end up being worse as we'll end up having stored the ranges and then needing to also store / replace that with the constructed strings).
@davidfowl?
Let's address it separately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would stringy those up front.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Meaning as-is, right? Does that mean these names are generally used?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep. We have another source generator thing that will replace this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was roughly what I was thinking: eerhardt@aa33457. At first I thought I could eliminate the substring allocs all together.
However, it appears that there is a hidden expectation that the scope objects implement
IReadOnlyList<KeyValuePair<string, object>>
, which means this would be a breaking change. Or we could make theLogValues
structs implement bothIReadOnlyList<KeyValuePair<string, object>>
andIReadOnlyList<KeyValuePair<ReadOnlyMemory<char>, object>>
, and have the Console logger (and any other loggers) check for both.