-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dwylbot epics may not need to be time estimated #138
Labels
Milestone
Comments
For now this is the best course of action. ( |
13 tasks
Agreed 👍 |
ghost
modified the milestone:
Backlog
Aug 9, 2017
ghost
added
the
priority-2
label
Aug 9, 2017
ghost
removed
the
discuss
label
Aug 9, 2017
naazy
added
in-progress
T2h
in-review
T25m
and removed
help wanted
T2h
in-progress
labels
Aug 18, 2017
naazy
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 18, 2017
samhstn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 1, 2017
epics do not need to be time estimated #138
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
An overarching epic which will take a number of days or weeks which is put
in-progress
should not need to be time estimated (we don't even have a time label for this)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: