Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename outcome to status #127

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 22, 2018
Merged

Conversation

cescoffier
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #125

This PR:

README.adoc Outdated

Within CDI contexts, beans that implement `HealthCheck` and annotated with `@Health` are discovered automatically and are invoked by the framework or runtime when the outermost protocol entry point (i.e. `http://HOST:PORT/health`) receives an inbound request.
Within CDI contexts, beans that implement `HealthCheck` are discovered automatically and are invoked by the framework or runtime when the outermost protocol entry point (i.e. `http://HOST:PORT/health`) receives an inbound request.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The previous sentence asks to annotated with @health. You should not change this under this issue though. We can discuss this under a different issue on whether it is necessary to require @Health. I see there is no point either. However, we need to discuss this under a different issue.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is more a cleanup as @Health has been deprecated in the last version of the spec. I will revert this commit.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

Copy link
Member

@Emily-Jiang Emily-Jiang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks @cescoffier !

@derekm
Copy link
Contributor

derekm commented Oct 18, 2018

This change breaks service meshes.

Can we revert most of these changes?

The miscellaneous cleanups are fine...

@Emily-Jiang @cescoffier

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants