Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[libbeat][decoder] - Adding generic decoding package to libbeat #36028

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ShourieG
Copy link
Contributor

@ShourieG ShourieG commented Jul 10, 2023

Type of change

  • Enhancement

What does this PR do?

Adds a generic decoder in libbeat

Why is it important?

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in CHANGELOG.next.asciidoc or CHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.

Author's Checklist

  • [ ]

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Use cases

Screenshots

Logs

@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Jul 10, 2023
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 10, 2023

This pull request does not have a backport label.
If this is a bug or security fix, could you label this PR @ShourieG? 🙏.
For such, you'll need to label your PR with:

  • The upcoming major version of the Elastic Stack
  • The upcoming minor version of the Elastic Stack (if you're not pushing a breaking change)

To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-v8./d.0 is the label to automatically backport to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit

@ShourieG ShourieG changed the title Libbeat/decoder Adding generic decoding package to libbeat Jul 10, 2023
@ShourieG ShourieG changed the title Adding generic decoding package to libbeat [libbeat][decoder] - Adding generic decoding package to libbeat Jul 10, 2023
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

elasticmachine commented Jul 10, 2023

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Start Time: 2023-07-10T08:52:15.889+0000

  • Duration: 62 min 3 sec

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 8181
Skipped 377
Total 8558

💚 Flaky test report

Tests succeeded.

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

  • /package : Generate the packages and run the E2E tests.

  • /beats-tester : Run the installation tests with beats-tester.

  • run elasticsearch-ci/docs : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Jul 10, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 5, 2024

This pull request does not have a backport label.
If this is a bug or security fix, could you label this PR @ShourieG? 🙏.
For such, you'll need to label your PR with:

  • The upcoming major version of the Elastic Stack
  • The upcoming minor version of the Elastic Stack (if you're not pushing a breaking change)

To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-v8./d.0 is the label to automatically backport to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit

@narph narph added Team:Security-Service Integrations Security Service Integrations Team and removed Team:Security-External Integrations labels Feb 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Team:Security-Service Integrations Security Service Integrations Team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants