Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.13](backport #38094) Memory queue: cancel in-progress writes on queue closed, not producer closed #38178

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Mar 4, 2024

This is an automatic backport of pull request #38094 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

… closed (#38094)

Fixes a race condition that could lead to incorrect event totals and occasional panics #37702.

Once a producer sends a get request to the memory queue, it must wait on the response unless the queue itself is closed, otherwise it can return a false failure. The previous code mistakenly waited on the done signal for the current producer rather than the queue. This PR adds the queue's done signal to the producer struct, and waits on that once the insert request is sent.

(cherry picked from commit d23b4d3)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 4, 2024 17:54
@mergify mergify bot added the backport label Mar 4, 2024
@mergify mergify bot requested review from rdner and fearful-symmetry and removed request for a team March 4, 2024 17:54
@mergify mergify bot assigned faec Mar 4, 2024
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Mar 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Mar 4, 2024

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b mergify/bp/8.13/pr-38094 upstream/mergify/bp/8.13/pr-38094
git merge upstream/8.13
git push upstream mergify/bp/8.13/pr-38094

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

elasticmachine commented Mar 4, 2024

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Duration: 131 min 27 sec

❕ Flaky test report

No test was executed to be analysed.

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

  • /package : Generate the packages and run the E2E tests.

  • /beats-tester : Run the installation tests with beats-tester.

  • run elasticsearch-ci/docs : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

@pierrehilbert pierrehilbert added the Team:Elastic-Agent Label for the Agent team label Mar 5, 2024
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/elastic-agent (Team:Elastic-Agent)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Mar 5, 2024
@pierrehilbert pierrehilbert requested review from faec and removed request for rdner and fearful-symmetry March 5, 2024 10:17
@faec faec merged commit 91fe08d into 8.13 Mar 5, 2024
89 checks passed
@faec faec deleted the mergify/bp/8.13/pr-38094 branch March 5, 2024 19:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Team:Elastic-Agent Label for the Agent team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants