Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[7.17](backport #39087) Migrate packetbeat to static Buildkite pipeline #39104

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Proposed commit message

This commit refactors the packetbeat pipeline to the pipeline selector
approach as laid out in #38783.

Related issues

Screenshots

Logs

This commit refactors the packetbeat pipeline to the pipeline selector
approach as laid out in #38783.

Relates https:/elastic/ingest-dev/issues/3072

(cherry picked from commit 8f8f313)

# Conflicts:
#	.buildkite/packetbeat/pipeline.packetbeat.yml
#	.buildkite/pipeline.yml
#	.buildkite/scripts/common.sh
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner April 22, 2024 09:42
@mergify mergify bot added backport conflicts There is a conflict in the backported pull request labels Apr 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Cherry-pick of 8f8f313 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/7.17/pr-39087
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/7.17'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 8f8f3137f2.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   .buildkite/hooks/pre-command
	deleted:    .buildkite/scripts/generate_packetbeat_pipeline.sh

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
	both modified:   .buildkite/packetbeat/pipeline.packetbeat.yml
	both modified:   .buildkite/pipeline.yml
	both modified:   .buildkite/scripts/common.sh

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Apr 22, 2024
@botelastic
Copy link

botelastic bot commented Apr 22, 2024

This pull request doesn't have a Team:<team> label.

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Start Time: 2024-04-22T09:42:49.978+0000

  • Duration: 13 min 28 sec

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 3
Skipped 0
Total 3

💚 Flaky test report

Tests succeeded.

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

  • /package : Generate the packages and run the E2E tests.

  • /beats-tester : Run the installation tests with beats-tester.

  • run elasticsearch-ci/docs : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Apr 22, 2024

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b mergify/bp/7.17/pr-39087 upstream/mergify/bp/7.17/pr-39087
git merge upstream/7.17
git push upstream mergify/bp/7.17/pr-39087

@dliappis
Copy link
Contributor

closed in favor of #39110

@dliappis dliappis closed this Apr 22, 2024
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/7.17/pr-39087 branch April 22, 2024 11:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport conflicts There is a conflict in the backported pull request needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants