Discovery/Jgroups: Upgrade to 2.9.0 #7
Labels
Comments
|
Discovery/Jgroups: Upgrade to 2.9.0. Closed by 78eaacc. |
johtani
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 5, 2015
Currently, Kuromoji have JapaneseIterationMarkCharFilter. Add IterationMarkCharFilter to analysis-kuromoji. Closes #7.
dadoonet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 5, 2015
rahulanishetty
referenced
this issue
in rahulanishetty/elasticsearch
Jan 14, 2017
Rahul/rest client 1.4.1
This was referenced Jul 18, 2019
henningandersen
referenced
this issue
in henningandersen/elasticsearch
Jun 4, 2020
With this commit our parameter sources handle the default type name as string by default and implement a fallback to treat it as a structured object (as in earlier versions of Rally) Relates #7
palesz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2021
…9765) Previously we did not resolve the attributes recursively which meant that if a field or expression was re-aliased multiple times (through multiple levels of subqueries), the aliases were only resolved one level down. This led to failed query translation because `ReferenceAttribute`s were pointing to non-existing attributes during query translation. For example the query ```sql SELECT i AS j FROM ( SELECT int AS i FROM test) ORDER BY j ``` failed during translation because the `OrderBy` resolved the `j` ReferenceAttribute to another `i` ReferenceAttribute that was later removed by an Optimization: ``` OrderBy[[Order[j{r}#4,ASC,LAST]]] ! OrderBy[[Order[i{r}#2,ASC,LAST]]] \_Project[[j]] = \_Project[[j]] \_Project[[i]] ! \_EsRelation[test][date{f}#6, some{f}#7, some.string{f}#8, some.string..] \_EsRelation[test][date{f}#6, some{f}#7, some.string{f}#8, some.string..] ! ``` By resolving the `Attributes` recursively both `j{r}` and `i{r}` will resolve to `test.int{f}` above: ``` OrderBy[[Order[test.int{f}#22,ASC,LAST]]] = OrderBy[[Order[test.int{f}#22,ASC,LAST]]] \_Project[[j]] = \_Project[[j]] \_Project[[i]] ! \_EsRelation[test][date{f}#6, some{f}#7, some.string{f}#8, some.string..] \_EsRelation[test][date{f}#6, some{f}#7, some.string{f}#8, some.string..] ! ``` The scope of recursive resolution depends on how the `AttributeMap` is constructed and populated. Fixes #67237
palesz
pushed a commit
to palesz/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2021
…astic#69765) Previously we did not resolve the attributes recursively which meant that if a field or expression was re-aliased multiple times (through multiple levels of subqueries), the aliases were only resolved one level down. This led to failed query translation because `ReferenceAttribute`s were pointing to non-existing attributes during query translation. For example the query ```sql SELECT i AS j FROM ( SELECT int AS i FROM test) ORDER BY j ``` failed during translation because the `OrderBy` resolved the `j` ReferenceAttribute to another `i` ReferenceAttribute that was later removed by an Optimization: ``` OrderBy[[Order[j{r}elastic#4,ASC,LAST]]] ! OrderBy[[Order[i{r}elastic#2,ASC,LAST]]] \_Project[[j]] = \_Project[[j]] \_Project[[i]] ! \_EsRelation[test][date{f}elastic#6, some{f}elastic#7, some.string{f}elastic#8, some.string..] \_EsRelation[test][date{f}elastic#6, some{f}elastic#7, some.string{f}elastic#8, some.string..] ! ``` By resolving the `Attributes` recursively both `j{r}` and `i{r}` will resolve to `test.int{f}` above: ``` OrderBy[[Order[test.int{f}elastic#22,ASC,LAST]]] = OrderBy[[Order[test.int{f}elastic#22,ASC,LAST]]] \_Project[[j]] = \_Project[[j]] \_Project[[i]] ! \_EsRelation[test][date{f}elastic#6, some{f}elastic#7, some.string{f}elastic#8, some.string..] \_EsRelation[test][date{f}elastic#6, some{f}elastic#7, some.string{f}elastic#8, some.string..] ! ``` The scope of recursive resolution depends on how the `AttributeMap` is constructed and populated. Fixes elastic#67237
palesz
pushed a commit
to palesz/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2021
…astic#69765) Previously we did not resolve the attributes recursively which meant that if a field or expression was re-aliased multiple times (through multiple levels of subqueries), the aliases were only resolved one level down. This led to failed query translation because `ReferenceAttribute`s were pointing to non-existing attributes during query translation. For example the query ```sql SELECT i AS j FROM ( SELECT int AS i FROM test) ORDER BY j ``` failed during translation because the `OrderBy` resolved the `j` ReferenceAttribute to another `i` ReferenceAttribute that was later removed by an Optimization: ``` OrderBy[[Order[j{r}elastic#4,ASC,LAST]]] ! OrderBy[[Order[i{r}elastic#2,ASC,LAST]]] \_Project[[j]] = \_Project[[j]] \_Project[[i]] ! \_EsRelation[test][date{f}elastic#6, some{f}elastic#7, some.string{f}elastic#8, some.string..] \_EsRelation[test][date{f}elastic#6, some{f}elastic#7, some.string{f}elastic#8, some.string..] ! ``` By resolving the `Attributes` recursively both `j{r}` and `i{r}` will resolve to `test.int{f}` above: ``` OrderBy[[Order[test.int{f}elastic#22,ASC,LAST]]] = OrderBy[[Order[test.int{f}elastic#22,ASC,LAST]]] \_Project[[j]] = \_Project[[j]] \_Project[[i]] ! \_EsRelation[test][date{f}elastic#6, some{f}elastic#7, some.string{f}elastic#8, some.string..] \_EsRelation[test][date{f}elastic#6, some{f}elastic#7, some.string{f}elastic#8, some.string..] ! ``` The scope of recursive resolution depends on how the `AttributeMap` is constructed and populated. Fixes elastic#67237
palesz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2021
…9765) (#70325) Previously we did not resolve the attributes recursively which meant that if a field or expression was re-aliased multiple times (through multiple levels of subqueries), the aliases were only resolved one level down. This led to failed query translation because `ReferenceAttribute`s were pointing to non-existing attributes during query translation. For example the query ```sql SELECT i AS j FROM ( SELECT int AS i FROM test) ORDER BY j ``` failed during translation because the `OrderBy` resolved the `j` ReferenceAttribute to another `i` ReferenceAttribute that was later removed by an Optimization: ``` OrderBy[[Order[j{r}#4,ASC,LAST]]] ! OrderBy[[Order[i{r}#2,ASC,LAST]]] \_Project[[j]] = \_Project[[j]] \_Project[[i]] ! \_EsRelation[test][date{f}#6, some{f}#7, some.string{f}#8, some.string..] \_EsRelation[test][date{f}#6, some{f}#7, some.string{f}#8, some.string..] ! ``` By resolving the `Attributes` recursively both `j{r}` and `i{r}` will resolve to `test.int{f}` above: ``` OrderBy[[Order[test.int{f}#22,ASC,LAST]]] = OrderBy[[Order[test.int{f}#22,ASC,LAST]]] \_Project[[j]] = \_Project[[j]] \_Project[[i]] ! \_EsRelation[test][date{f}#6, some{f}#7, some.string{f}#8, some.string..] \_EsRelation[test][date{f}#6, some{f}#7, some.string{f}#8, some.string..] ! ``` The scope of recursive resolution depends on how the `AttributeMap` is constructed and populated. Fixes #67237
palesz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2021
…9765) (#70322) Previously we did not resolve the attributes recursively which meant that if a field or expression was re-aliased multiple times (through multiple levels of subqueries), the aliases were only resolved one level down. This led to failed query translation because `ReferenceAttribute`s were pointing to non-existing attributes during query translation. For example the query ```sql SELECT i AS j FROM ( SELECT int AS i FROM test) ORDER BY j ``` failed during translation because the `OrderBy` resolved the `j` ReferenceAttribute to another `i` ReferenceAttribute that was later removed by an Optimization: ``` OrderBy[[Order[j{r}#4,ASC,LAST]]] ! OrderBy[[Order[i{r}#2,ASC,LAST]]] \_Project[[j]] = \_Project[[j]] \_Project[[i]] ! \_EsRelation[test][date{f}#6, some{f}#7, some.string{f}#8, some.string..] \_EsRelation[test][date{f}#6, some{f}#7, some.string{f}#8, some.string..] ! ``` By resolving the `Attributes` recursively both `j{r}` and `i{r}` will resolve to `test.int{f}` above: ``` OrderBy[[Order[test.int{f}#22,ASC,LAST]]] = OrderBy[[Order[test.int{f}#22,ASC,LAST]]] \_Project[[j]] = \_Project[[j]] \_Project[[i]] ! \_EsRelation[test][date{f}#6, some{f}#7, some.string{f}#8, some.string..] \_EsRelation[test][date{f}#6, some{f}#7, some.string{f}#8, some.string..] ! ``` The scope of recursive resolution depends on how the `AttributeMap` is constructed and populated. Fixes #67237
fcofdez
pushed a commit
to fcofdez/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Nov 19, 2021
…ons_prepare_more Spacetime transactions prepare more
cbuescher
pushed a commit
to cbuescher/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2023
With this commit we will fail a benchmarking trial run with night_rally if Rally failed at least once. Closes elastic#7
matthewabbott
pushed a commit
to matthewabbott/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2024
…sts testFold {TestCase=<double> elastic#7} elastic#114175
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Upgrade to latest JGroups release (2.9.0) from the current (2.8.0)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: