-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix identification of action type in error message #68260
Merged
tvernum
merged 2 commits into
elastic:master
from
tvernum:fix/68144-identify-cluster-actions
Feb 3, 2021
Merged
Fix identification of action type in error message #68260
tvernum
merged 2 commits into
elastic:master
from
tvernum:fix/68144-identify-cluster-actions
Feb 3, 2021
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some actions that start with "indices:" are actually handled by cluster privileges in ES security (e.g. indices:admin/template/*) In elastic#60357 and elastic#66900 we added better context information for the error messages that are generated when an action is denied, but the generation of that message did not correctly classify actions between cluster and index level privileges. This change does 2 things: 1. It fixes the code that determines whether an action is handled by a cluster privilege or an index privilege 2. Includes the words "cluster" and "index" in the error message so that classification is clear to the reader The latter change is not directly related to the issue being resolved, but in the course of fixing the issue it became evident that the message lacked clarity because it did not tell the reader what type of privilege would be needed to resolve the access denied issue. Resolves: elastic#68144
tvernum
added
>non-issue
:Security/Authorization
Roles, Privileges, DLS/FLS, RBAC/ABAC
v8.0.0
v7.12.0
labels
Jan 31, 2021
Pinging @elastic/es-security (Team:Security) |
I've marked this as |
albertzaharovits
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Includes the words "cluster" and "index" in the error message so
that classification is clear to the reader
++ I was going to suggest it.
@elasticmachine update branch |
tvernum
added a commit
to tvernum/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2021
Some actions that start with "indices:" are actually handled by cluster privileges in ES security (e.g. indices:admin/template/*) In elastic#60357 and elastic#66900 we added better context information for the error messages that are generated when an action is denied, but the generation of that message did not correctly classify actions between cluster and index level privileges. This change does 2 things: 1. It fixes the code that determines whether an action is handled by a cluster privilege or an index privilege 2. Includes the words "cluster" and "index" in the error message so that classification is clear to the reader The latter change is not directly related to the issue being resolved, but in the course of fixing the issue it became evident that the message lacked clarity because it did not tell the reader what type of privilege would be needed to resolve the access denied issue. Backport of: elastic#68260
tvernum
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2021
Some actions that start with "indices:" are actually handled by cluster privileges in ES security (e.g. indices:admin/template/*) In #60357 and #66900 we added better context information for the error messages that are generated when an action is denied, but the generation of that message did not correctly classify actions between cluster and index level privileges. This change does 2 things: 1. It fixes the code that determines whether an action is handled by a cluster privilege or an index privilege 2. Includes the words "cluster" and "index" in the error message so that classification is clear to the reader The latter change is not directly related to the issue being resolved, but in the course of fixing the issue it became evident that the message lacked clarity because it did not tell the reader what type of privilege would be needed to resolve the access denied issue. Backport of: #68260
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
>non-issue
:Security/Authorization
Roles, Privileges, DLS/FLS, RBAC/ABAC
Team:Security
Meta label for security team
v7.12.0
v8.0.0-alpha1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some actions that start with "indices:" are actually handled by
cluster privileges in ES security (e.g. indices:admin/template/*)
In #60357 and #66900 we added better context information for the
error messages that are generated when an action is denied, but the
generation of that message did not correctly classify actions between
cluster and index level privileges.
This change does 2 things:
cluster privilege or an index privilege
that classification is clear to the reader
The latter change is not directly related to the issue being resolved,
but in the course of fixing the issue it became evident that the
message lacked clarity because it did not tell the reader what type of
privilege would be needed to resolve the access denied issue.
Resolves: #68144