Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove IFieldType from stack monitoring #124168

Closed
Tracked by #107235
smith opened this issue Jan 31, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #124288
Closed
Tracked by #107235

Remove IFieldType from stack monitoring #124168

smith opened this issue Jan 31, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #124288
Assignees
Labels
Feature:Stack Monitoring Team:Infra Monitoring UI - DEPRECATED DEPRECATED - Label for the Infra Monitoring UI team. Use Team:obs-ux-infra_services

Comments

@smith
Copy link
Contributor

smith commented Jan 31, 2022

📝 Summary

The IFieldType interface is going to be removed because it's too ambiguous. We should replace its usage with either DataViewField or DataViewFieldBase.

part of #107235

✔️ Acceptance criteria

  • No references to IFieldType exist in the stack monitoring codebase.
  • The impacted code remains fully typed using appropriate replacements.
@smith smith changed the title x-pack/plugins/monitoring Remove IFieldType from stack monitoring Jan 31, 2022
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Jan 31, 2022
@smith smith added Feature:Stack Monitoring Team:Infra Monitoring UI - DEPRECATED DEPRECATED - Label for the Infra Monitoring UI team. Use Team:obs-ux-infra_services labels Jan 31, 2022
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/infra-monitoring-ui (Team:Infra Monitoring UI)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature:Stack Monitoring Team:Infra Monitoring UI - DEPRECATED DEPRECATED - Label for the Infra Monitoring UI team. Use Team:obs-ux-infra_services
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants