[Security Solution] Integration tests for rule type field diff algorithms
#193375
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dplumlee
added
test
release_note:skip
8 tasks
…rithm-integration-tests
|
Pinging @elastic/security-detections-response (Team:Detections and Resp) |
|
Pinging @elastic/security-solution (Team: SecuritySolution) |
|
Pinging @elastic/security-detection-rule-management (Team:Detection Rule Management) |
Flaky Test Runner Stats🟠 Some tests failed. - kibana-flaky-test-suite-runner#7044[❌] x-pack/test/security_solution_api_integration/test_suites/detections_response/rules_management/prebuilt_rules/management/trial_license_complete_tier/configs/ess.config.ts: 0/100 tests passed. |
Flaky Test Runner Stats🎉 All tests passed! - kibana-flaky-test-suite-runner#7046[✅] x-pack/test/security_solution_api_integration/test_suites/detections_response/rules_management/prebuilt_rules/management/trial_license_complete_tier/configs/ess.config.ts: 100/100 tests passed. |
…rithm-integration-tests
💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky
Failed CI StepsMetrics [docs]
History
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: cc @dplumlee |
…rithm-integration-tests
jpdjere
reviewed
Oct 8, 2024
...les/management/trial_license_complete_tier/upgrade_review_prebuilt_rules.rule_type_fields.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jpdjere
approved these changes
Oct 8, 2024
…rithm-integration-tests
|
Starting backport for target branches: 8.x |
💚 Build Succeeded
Metrics [docs]
History
cc @dplumlee |
kibanamachine
pushed a commit
to kibanamachine/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2024
…rithms (elastic#193375) ## Summary Completes elastic#190482 Switches rule `type` field to use the implemented diff algorithms assigned to them in elastic#193369 Adds integration tests in accordance to elastic#193372 for the `upgrade/_review` API endpoint for the rule `type` field diff algorithm. Also fixes some nested bracket misalignment that occurred in earlier PRs with some test files ### Checklist Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR. - [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios - [x] [Flaky Test Runner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was used on any tests changed ### For maintainers - [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process) (cherry picked from commit e119d83)
💚 All backports created successfully
Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI. Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
kibanamachine
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2024
… field diff algorithms (#193375) (#195518) # Backport This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.x`: - [[Security Solution] Integration tests for rule `type` field diff algorithms (#193375)](#193375) <!--- Backport version: 9.4.3 --> ### Questions ? Please refer to the [Backport tool documentation](https:/sqren/backport) <!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Davis Plumlee","email":"[email protected]"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2024-10-08T22:46:33Z","message":"[Security Solution] Integration tests for rule `type` field diff algorithms (#193375)\n\n## Summary\r\n\r\nCompletes https:/elastic/kibana/issues/190482\r\n\r\n\r\nSwitches rule `type` field to use the implemented diff algorithms\r\nassigned to them in https:/elastic/kibana/pull/193369\r\n\r\n\r\nAdds integration tests in accordance to\r\nhttps://pull/193372 for the `upgrade/_review`\r\nAPI endpoint for the rule `type` field diff algorithm.\r\n\r\nAlso fixes some nested bracket misalignment that occurred in earlier PRs\r\nwith some test files\r\n\r\n### Checklist\r\n\r\nDelete any items that are not applicable to this PR.\r\n\r\n- [x] [Unit or functional\r\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\r\nwere updated or added to match the most common scenarios\r\n- [x] [Flaky Test\r\nRunner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was\r\nused on any tests changed\r\n\r\n\r\n### For maintainers\r\n\r\n- [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled\r\nappropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)","sha":"e119d83c26387e85e9fdf3cc5d5eeceeebb04edb","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.0.0$":"main","^v8.16.0$":"8.x","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["test","release_note:skip","v9.0.0","Team:Detections and Resp","Team: SecuritySolution","Team:Detection Rule Management","Feature:Prebuilt Detection Rules","backport:prev-minor","v8.16.0"],"title":"[Security Solution] Integration tests for rule `type` field diff algorithms","number":193375,"url":"https:/elastic/kibana/pull/193375","mergeCommit":{"message":"[Security Solution] Integration tests for rule `type` field diff algorithms (#193375)\n\n## Summary\r\n\r\nCompletes https:/elastic/kibana/issues/190482\r\n\r\n\r\nSwitches rule `type` field to use the implemented diff algorithms\r\nassigned to them in https:/elastic/kibana/pull/193369\r\n\r\n\r\nAdds integration tests in accordance to\r\nhttps://pull/193372 for the `upgrade/_review`\r\nAPI endpoint for the rule `type` field diff algorithm.\r\n\r\nAlso fixes some nested bracket misalignment that occurred in earlier PRs\r\nwith some test files\r\n\r\n### Checklist\r\n\r\nDelete any items that are not applicable to this PR.\r\n\r\n- [x] [Unit or functional\r\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\r\nwere updated or added to match the most common scenarios\r\n- [x] [Flaky Test\r\nRunner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was\r\nused on any tests changed\r\n\r\n\r\n### For maintainers\r\n\r\n- [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled\r\nappropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)","sha":"e119d83c26387e85e9fdf3cc5d5eeceeebb04edb"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":["8.x"],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.0.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.0.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https:/elastic/kibana/pull/193375","number":193375,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[Security Solution] Integration tests for rule `type` field diff algorithms (#193375)\n\n## Summary\r\n\r\nCompletes https:/elastic/kibana/issues/190482\r\n\r\n\r\nSwitches rule `type` field to use the implemented diff algorithms\r\nassigned to them in https:/elastic/kibana/pull/193369\r\n\r\n\r\nAdds integration tests in accordance to\r\nhttps://pull/193372 for the `upgrade/_review`\r\nAPI endpoint for the rule `type` field diff algorithm.\r\n\r\nAlso fixes some nested bracket misalignment that occurred in earlier PRs\r\nwith some test files\r\n\r\n### Checklist\r\n\r\nDelete any items that are not applicable to this PR.\r\n\r\n- [x] [Unit or functional\r\ntests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)\r\nwere updated or added to match the most common scenarios\r\n- [x] [Flaky Test\r\nRunner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was\r\nused on any tests changed\r\n\r\n\r\n### For maintainers\r\n\r\n- [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled\r\nappropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)","sha":"e119d83c26387e85e9fdf3cc5d5eeceeebb04edb"}},{"branch":"8.x","label":"v8.16.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v8.16.0$","isSourceBranch":false,"state":"NOT_CREATED"}]}] BACKPORT--> Co-authored-by: Davis Plumlee <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Completes #190482
Switches rule
typefield to use the implemented diff algorithms assigned to them in #193369Adds integration tests in accordance to #193372 for the
upgrade/_reviewAPI endpoint for the ruletypefield diff algorithm.Also fixes some nested bracket misalignment that occurred in earlier PRs with some test files
Checklist
Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.
For maintainers