Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to Ember 5.12 #2598

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update to Ember 5.12 #2598

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

RobbieTheWagner
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@RobbieTheWagner
Copy link
Member Author

@patricklx could you please let me know if you notice anything wrong with this PR? I know it's huge and I don't expect you to review it line by line, but if you could please let me know what you think, that would be great, thank you!

@@ -924,8 +902,6 @@ module('Object Inspector', function (hooks) {
});

test('Date fields are editable', async function (assert) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure why this test is failing now.
I see that we have 2 respondWith('objectInspector:saveProperty'), but we are only doing 1 save.
So I think you can just remove the first respondWith('objectInspector:saveProperty')

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@patricklx hmm, yes that does seem odd, however, the boolean tests are failing too, and that one just has one respondWith. I will try removing what you said though and see if anything changes.

name: 'ember-lts-3.16',
npm: {
devDependencies: {
'@ember/test-helpers': '^2.4.0',
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also need to add ember-resolver v11.0.1 until ember-source < 4.12

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@patricklx Yeah, is that safe to do? I honestly don't know if we will use consuming app's resolvers when they boot inspector? If so, that sounds like a good fix.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@RobbieTheWagner it's safe. It's only used for the UI. We do not consume it from app code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants