fix: task input dropdowns #3152
Conversation
|
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve formatting adjustments to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant StatusDropdown
participant TaskStatus
User->>StatusDropdown: Selects status
StatusDropdown->>TaskStatus: Passes selected status and isEpic
TaskStatus->>User: Displays updated task status
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/web/lib/features/auth-user-task-input.tsx (2)
32-57: Approved with suggestion: Dropdown component formattingThe formatting changes to the dropdown components improve code readability. The consistent indentation and line breaks make the component structure clearer.
Consider using template literals for long className strings to improve readability further. For example:
- className="lg:max-w-[170px] w-full text-xs" + className={` + lg:max-w-[170px] + w-full + text-xs + `}This approach can make long className strings more manageable and easier to read.
Line range hint
58-67: Consider removing commented-out codeThe file contains a block of commented-out code. It's generally better to remove unused code entirely and rely on version control systems for tracking changes and history.
Consider removing the commented-out code block to improve code cleanliness. If this code might be needed in the future, it's better to keep it in version control history rather than as comments in the current file.
apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1226-1226: Good use of max-height and scrolling, but reconsider hiding the scrollbarThe implementation of max-height and vertical scrolling in the MultipleStatusDropdown component is a good approach. It allows the dropdown to accommodate varying amounts of content while maintaining a reasonable size.
However, hiding the scrollbar with
scrollbar-hidemight affect usability, as users may not realize they can scroll if there's more content. Consider showing a styled scrollbar instead. You could use CSS to style the scrollbar for better visual integration:.styled-scrollbar { scrollbar-width: thin; scrollbar-color: rgba(155, 155, 155, 0.5) transparent; } .styled-scrollbar::-webkit-scrollbar { width: 6px; } .styled-scrollbar::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background-color: rgba(155, 155, 155, 0.5); border-radius: 3px; }Then, replace
scrollbar-hidewithstyled-scrollbarin your className.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/web/lib/features/auth-user-task-input.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
apps/web/lib/features/auth-user-task-input.tsx (4)
10-10: LGTM: Import statement consolidationThe consolidation of import statements for task-related components improves code readability without changing functionality.
14-16: Approved: Consistent formattingThe added spaces improve code readability and maintain consistent formatting throughout the component.
18-30: LGTM: Improved JSX formattingThe changes to the JSX structure improve code readability by properly indenting nested elements. This makes the component structure easier to understand at a glance.
Line range hint
1-70: Verify alignment with PR objectivesThe changes in this file are primarily formatting improvements, which enhance code readability. However, the PR objectives mentioned fixing task input dropdowns, but no such fixes are evident in this file.
Please clarify if there are additional changes related to fixing task input dropdowns that are not reflected in this file. If the fix is implemented elsewhere, consider updating the PR description to accurately reflect the changes made.
To verify if there are any other relevant changes, you can run the following script:
This will search for any mentions of "dropdown" or "task input" in TypeScript and TSX files, excluding the current file.
apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-1250: Consider splitting this file for improved maintainabilityWhile the changes made to this file are generally positive and improve the component's functionality, it's worth noting that this file is quite large and contains multiple components and utility functions.
To improve maintainability and make the codebase easier to navigate, consider splitting this file into smaller, more focused files. For example:
- Create a separate file for each main component (StatusDropdown, MultipleStatusDropdown, TaskStatus, etc.).
- Group related utility functions and hooks into their own files (e.g.,
useTaskStatusValue,useTaskPrioritiesValue, etc.).- Create an index file to export all components and utilities, maintaining the current import structure for other parts of the application.
This refactoring would make it easier to understand, maintain, and test each component individually. It would also improve code reusability and potentially reduce merge conflicts in collaborative development.
To help with this refactoring, you can use the following command to identify the main components and functions that could be separated:
#!/bin/bash # List all exported functions and components in the file rg --type typescript --type tsx "^export (function|const) \w+" apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status.tsxThis will give you a list of the main exports, which can guide your refactoring process.
Line range hint
1-1250: Clarify the purpose and usage of the newisEpicpropA new prop
isEpichas been added to the TaskStatus component and is being passed down in various places throughout the file. While the implementation seems consistent, it's not immediately clear how this prop affects the component's behavior or appearance.Could you provide more context on the purpose of the
isEpicprop? Specifically:
- How does it change the rendering or functionality of the TaskStatus component?
- Are there any specific styles or behaviors associated with epic tasks?
- Is there any documentation that needs to be updated to reflect this new property?
Additionally, to ensure this change is implemented correctly across the codebase, you may want to run the following command to check for any inconsistencies:
This will help identify any places where the
isEpicprop might need to be added or where its handling might be inconsistent.
| className="p-4 md:p-4 shadow-xlcard dark:shadow-lgcard-white dark:bg-[#1B1D22] dark:border dark:border-[#FFFFFF33] flex flex-col gap-2.5 h-[206px] overflow-x-scroll" | ||
| > |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using max-height and adding vertical scrolling
The addition of a fixed height (206px) and horizontal scrolling improves the dropdown's usability. However, a fixed height might not be optimal for all screen sizes and could potentially cut off content.
Consider the following improvements:
- Use
max-heightinstead of a fixedheightto accommodate varying content lengths. - Add vertical scrolling to ensure all options are accessible, especially on smaller screens.
- Implement responsive design to adjust the max-height based on screen size.
Here's a suggested modification:
- className="p-4 md:p-4 shadow-xlcard dark:shadow-lgcard-white dark:bg-[#1B1D22] dark:border dark:border-[#FFFFFF33] flex flex-col gap-2.5 h-[206px] overflow-x-scroll"
+ className="p-4 md:p-4 shadow-xlcard dark:shadow-lgcard-white dark:bg-[#1B1D22] dark:border dark:border-[#FFFFFF33] flex flex-col gap-2.5 max-h-[300px] overflow-y-auto overflow-x-hidden"This change allows the dropdown to grow up to 300px in height (adjustable as needed) and adds vertical scrolling while removing horizontal scrolling.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| className="p-4 md:p-4 shadow-xlcard dark:shadow-lgcard-white dark:bg-[#1B1D22] dark:border dark:border-[#FFFFFF33] flex flex-col gap-2.5 h-[206px] overflow-x-scroll" | |
| > | |
| className="p-4 md:p-4 shadow-xlcard dark:shadow-lgcard-white dark:bg-[#1B1D22] dark:border dark:border-[#FFFFFF33] flex flex-col gap-2.5 max-h-[300px] overflow-y-auto overflow-x-hidden" | |
| > |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status.tsx (4)
1078-1079: Improved dropdown menu styling and scrolling behaviorThe changes to the Card component's className enhance the dropdown menu's appearance and functionality:
- Added
max-h-[206px]to limit the maximum height of the dropdown.- Added
overflow-x-scrollto enable horizontal scrolling when content exceeds the width.These changes improve the user experience by preventing the dropdown from becoming too tall and allowing users to scroll horizontally if needed. However, there are a couple of points to consider:
- Using a fixed
max-heightmight not be ideal for all screen sizes. Consider using a responsive approach or CSS variables for better flexibility.overflow-x-scrollmight not be necessary unless you expect the content to exceed the width frequently. If not, you could remove it or change it tooverflow-x-auto.Consider the following improvements:
- className="p-4 md:p-4 shadow-xlcard dark:shadow-lgcard-white dark:bg-[#1B1D22] dark:border dark:border-[#FFFFFF33] flex flex-col gap-2.5 max-h-[206px] overflow-x-scroll" + className="p-4 md:p-4 shadow-xlcard dark:shadow-lgcard-white dark:bg-[#1B1D22] dark:border dark:border-[#FFFFFF33] flex flex-col gap-2.5 max-h-[50vh] overflow-y-auto overflow-x-hidden"This change uses a relative
max-height(50% of the viewport height) and changes the overflow behavior to be more appropriate for most use cases.
Line range hint
1031-1189: Consider refactoring StatusDropdown for improved maintainabilityThe StatusDropdown component is quite complex and handles many different cases. While the recent changes don't introduce any issues, there are some suggestions to improve the overall code quality and maintainability:
Extract smaller components: The component could benefit from being broken down into smaller, more focused components. For example, the Listbox.Option rendering could be extracted into a separate component.
Use custom hooks: Consider extracting some of the logic (e.g., handling multiple selection) into custom hooks to improve reusability and reduce the complexity of the main component.
Consistent naming: Ensure consistent naming conventions throughout the component. For example,
current_valueuses snake_case while the rest of the variables use camelCase.Prop types: Consider using TypeScript or PropTypes to more strictly define the expected props and their types.
Accessibility: Ensure that the dropdown is fully accessible, including keyboard navigation and proper ARIA attributes.
Here's a small example of how you could start refactoring:
// Extract this into a separate component const DropdownItem = ({ item, isSelected, onSelect, onRemove }) => ( <Listbox.Option value={item.value || item.name} as={Fragment}> <li className="cursor-pointer outline-none relative"> <TaskStatus showIcon={showIcon} {...item} cheched={isSelected} className={/* ... */} /> {isSelected && ( <button onClick={onRemove} className="absolute top-2.5 right-2 h-4 w-4 bg-light--theme-light dark:bg-dark--theme-light" > <XMarkIcon className="text-dark dark:text-white" height={16} width={16} /> </button> )} </li> </Listbox.Option> ); // Use in the main component {items.map((item) => ( <DropdownItem key={item.value || item.name} item={item} isSelected={/* ... */} onSelect={/* ... */} onRemove={/* ... */} /> ))}This refactoring would make the main component more readable and easier to maintain.
Line range hint
1191-1321: Consider merging StatusDropdown and MultipleStatusDropdown componentsThe MultipleStatusDropdown component is very similar to the StatusDropdown component, with the main difference being support for multiple selection. This duplication suggests an opportunity for code reuse and simplification:
Merge components: Consider combining StatusDropdown and MultipleStatusDropdown into a single, more flexible component that can handle both single and multiple selection modes.
Prop consistency: Ensure that all props are consistently named and used between the two components. For example,
showIssueLabelsis defined in the props but not used in MultipleStatusDropdown.DRY principle: There's repeated code for rendering the Listbox and its options. This could be extracted into a shared function or component.
Type safety: Use TypeScript to ensure type safety and improve maintainability, especially for complex prop structures.
Here's an example of how you could start refactoring:
interface StatusDropdownProps<T extends TStatusItem> { value: T | T[] | undefined; onChange: (value: string | string[]) => void; items: T[]; multiple?: boolean; // ... other props } function StatusDropdown<T extends TStatusItem>({ value, onChange, items, multiple = false, // ... other props }: StatusDropdownProps<T>) { // Shared logic here return ( <Listbox value={multiple ? (value as T[]) : (value as T)} onChange={onChange} multiple={multiple} > {/* Shared rendering logic */} </Listbox> ); } // Usage <StatusDropdown multiple={true} /* ... other props */ /> <StatusDropdown multiple={false} /* ... other props */ />This approach would reduce code duplication and make the component more flexible and easier to maintain.
Line range hint
1-1321: Consider refactoring the file for improved organization and maintainabilityWhile the recent changes don't introduce any significant issues, the overall structure of this file could be improved:
File splitting: This file is quite long and handles multiple concerns. Consider splitting it into smaller, more focused files. For example:
TaskStatusDropdown.tsxTaskPriorityDropdown.tsxTaskLabelDropdown.tsxStatusDropdown.tsx(generic component)useTaskStatus.ts(custom hooks)Component organization: Group related components and hooks together. This will make it easier to understand the relationships between different parts of the code.
Consistent naming: Ensure consistent naming conventions across components and functions. For example, some use PascalCase (e.g.,
TaskStatus), while others use camelCase (e.g.,useTaskStatusValue).Performance optimization: For large lists, consider implementing virtualization to improve performance. Libraries like
react-windowcan help with this.Prop drilling: There's a lot of prop drilling happening in some components. Consider using React Context or a state management library for deeply nested props.
Error handling: Add proper error handling and fallback UI for cases where data might be undefined or loading.
Testing: Given the complexity of these components, it would be beneficial to add unit and integration tests to ensure reliability and ease of refactoring.
To implement these suggestions:
- Create new files for each major component and move the code accordingly.
- Use a barrel file (index.ts) to simplify imports.
- Implement React Context for frequently used props:
// TaskContext.tsx import React, { createContext, useContext } from 'react'; const TaskContext = createContext(null); export const TaskProvider = ({ children, ...value }) => ( <TaskContext.Provider value={value}>{children}</TaskContext.Provider> ); export const useTaskContext = () => useContext(TaskContext); // Usage import { TaskProvider, useTaskContext } from './TaskContext'; const ParentComponent = () => ( <TaskProvider value={/* ... */}> <ChildComponents /> </TaskProvider> ); const ChildComponent = () => { const taskContext = useTaskContext(); // Use context values };These changes will significantly improve the maintainability and readability of your code.
Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue.
Type of Change
Checklist
Previous screenshots
Please add here videos or images of previous status
Current screenshots
Please add here videos or images of previous status
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
isEpicprop for better task status representation.Style
AuthUserTaskInputcomponent.